London Mayor Ken Livingstone is nothing if not confident. His latest scheme to bring Formula One racing to the city's West End looks like a madcap stunt, but a straw poll taken by the city's Evening Standard last week found almost three-quarters in favor.
The "cheeky chappie" of Labour politics has played all his cards right since splitting with the party in 2000 to contest the mayoral election as an independent.
Livingstone would be a "disaster" for London, Prime Minister Tony Blair opined, backing the decision to throw the rebel out of the party for five years.
"Red Ken" went on to win handsomely. He promptly embarked on policies, like charging for cars to enter the center, that many said would make Blair's prophecy come true.
Bolshie Londoners would simply boycott the five-pound congestion charge, and the technology was in any case not up to the job, they said. The objectors have since quietly eaten their words.
Likewise his decision to pour money into buses, seen by many Brits as the transport of the poor and unemployed, appears to have paid off.
Buses are more frequent and are running to schedule, prompting Londoners to take to them in droves. The capital's buses are carrying more passengers than at any time since the 1960s, with the number topping 6 million on one day in April.
Earlier this year, Blair was forced to retract and bring the mayor back into the party, overriding the grumbles of many senior party stalwarts.
"I am fundamentally and irretrievably against it. Ken Livingstone has only ever belonged to one party -- the Ken Livingstone party," former Labour leader Neil Kinnock said. He was overruled.
Livingstone has indeed always been his own man. He ran London as head of the Greater London Council from 1981 to 1986, during Labour's darkest hour.
Many Londoners recall his battle with the Conservative prime minister of the day, Margaret Thatcher. It was one of the few he lost.
To Thatcher's disgust, Livingstone hoisted a tatty banner with the number of the city's ever-rising unemployed on the roof of the GLC offices, directly across the Thames from the House of Parliament. She repaid this slur on her policies by shutting down the GLC altogether.
London was forced to do without a central governing body, and Livingstone retreated to the back benches of the House of Commons, where party leaders thought they had effectively buried him.
The party hierarchy fought hard to keep him out of the contest when Blair's government set up a Greater London Assembly and called city elections in May 2000, but Livingstone's popularity was decisive. He beat the official Labour candidate into a humiliating third place.
Once in office he set about modernizing the city with all the powers at his command. The private car, allowed free rein throughout the Thatcher years, was firmly in his sights.
Livingstone has also improved grimy London's appearance by pouring money not only into the West End but also into the poorer boroughs that rim much of the inner city.
Pavements were widened, trees planted, landmarks like Trafalgar Square pedestrianized and the privatized bus services induced by means of hard cash to increase their services.
Since taking office, Livingstone's methods have been true to his maverick image -- nothing is taboo.
He has abandoned the radically leftist policies of his immature years to link hands with the city's financial bosses in promoting high-rise buildings and business-friendly policies.
Returning to his leftist roots, he went out of his way to insult US President George Bush during his state visit last year, much to Blair's disgust, and he has been a fervent critic of Blair's foreign policy.
Earlier this year local elections through much of the country saw Labour severely punished for Blair's Iraq policy, but Livingstone, running this time on an official party ticket, was returned comfortably, albeit on a reduced majority.
Londoners remain faithful to their mayor, although some are skeptical of his grandstanding.
Livingstone is campaigning hard to bring the 2012 Olympic Games to the city, despite serious doubts that the transport network could cope, even with significant investment.
And now the bizarre notion of Formula One cars howling down the Mall, the route the queen takes for processions of state with her mounted guardsmen and colorful military bands, has tickled the public's fancy.
A few weeks ago I found myself at a Family Mart talking with the morning shift worker there, who has become my coffee guy. Both of us were in a funk over the “unseasonable” warm weather, a state of mind known as “solastalgia” — distress produced by environmental change. In fact, the weather was not that out of the ordinary in boiling Central Taiwan, and likely cooler than the temperatures we will experience in the near-future. According to the Taiwan Adaptation Platform, between 1957 and 2006, summer lengthened by 27.8 days, while winter shrunk by 29.7 days. Winter is not
Taiwan’s post-World War II architecture, “practical, cheap and temporary,” not to mention “rather forgettable.” This was a characterization recently given by Taiwan-based historian John Ross on his Formosa Files podcast. Yet the 1960s and 1970s were, in fact, the period of Taiwan’s foundational building boom, which, to a great extent, defined the look of Taiwan’s cities, determining the way denizens live today. During this period, functionalist concrete blocks and Chinese nostalgia gave way to new interpretations of modernism, large planned communities and high-rise skyscrapers. It is currently the subject of a new exhibition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum, Modern
March 25 to March 31 A 56-year-old Wu Li Yu-ke (吳李玉哥) was straightening out her artist son’s piles of drawings when she inadvertently flipped one over, revealing the blank backside of the paper. Absent-mindedly, she picked up a pencil and recalled how she used to sketch embroidery designs for her clothing business. Without clients and budget or labor constraints to worry about, Wu Li drew freely whatever image came to her mind. With much more free time now that her son had found a job, she found herself missing her home village in China, where she
In recent years, Slovakia has been seen as a highly democratic and Western-oriented Central European country. This image was reinforced by the election of the country’s first female president in 2019, efforts to provide extensive assistance to Ukraine and the strengthening of relations with Taiwan, all of which strengthened Slovakia’s position within the European Union. However, the latest developments in the country suggest that the situation is changing rapidly. As such, the presidential elections to be held on March 23 will be an indicator of whether Slovakia remains in the Western sphere of influence or moves eastward, notably towards Russia and