Fifty years after it spilled a lethal mix of mud, ash and water which washed away a bridge and derailed a train, killing 151 people, Mount Ruapehu, at 2,797 metres the highest peak in New Zealand's North Island, is threatening to do it again.
As the nation remembers the tragedy of Christmas Eve 1953 when Ruapehu, an active volcano, created one of the country's worst ever natural disasters, controversy has broken out about how to prevent the loss of lives next time and minimize the damage.
Mount Ruapehu contains a steaming 17-hectare lake in a crater near the summit which burst through the ice wall rim on Dec. 24, 1953 sending a lahar (a silt and rock-laden mudflow) down the mountainside and sweeping away the Tangiwai rail bridge minutes before the Wellington to Auckland night express roared through.
PHOTO: DPA
The engine and first five carriages were picked up by the unstoppable tide of swirling mud and rock and carried four kilometres down the Whangaehu River, killing 151 of the 285 people aboard and indelibly etching Tangiwai (Maori for "weeping waters") into the national consciousness.
It was the most devastating of the 60 or so lahars that have swept down the slopes of Ruapehu over the last 150 years.
It had not been predicted, though it followed a series of eruptions eight years earlier which emptied the crater lake and dammed its outlet with rocks and glacial ice allowing it to refill to a much greater depth than before.
In 1995, the mountain erupted again, emptying out the crater lake once more. It left a dam about 7m thick over its former outlet, but this time there is no ice content and geologists say the wall is weak.
The lake is refilling and barring another eruption, the boiling hot water is expected to reach the top of the dam within the next two years.
Another runaway lahar would damage the new road and rail bridges at Tangiwai and block State Highway 1 between the capital Wellington and the country's biggest city and commercial center Auckland.
Some want the government to construct a channel to allow the lake to be safely drained into the Whangaehu River and out to sea before it breaks through the top of the rim and creates a lahar.
But instead, the government has chosen an early warning system that is designed to give 90 minutes' notice of a lahar heading toward the bridges and an hour to stop traffic entering the part of the highway that would lie in its path.
It is also building a bund, or stopbank, to divert the lahar from the ecologically sensitive Tongariro River, a popular trout fisherman's waterway.
There are other issues. Ruapehu is one of several volcanoes in the central North Island, all revered by local Maori tribes for their spiritual and cultural links with ancestors and gods.
They oppose any artificial alteration of the mountain as an insult to their ancestors.
In addition, the volcanoes are all in the Tongariro National Park, one of only a score or so sites in the world with dual World Heritage status in recognition of outstanding natural and cultural values.
The government fears interfering with Ruapehu's crater lake could compromise that status.
Former Minister of Conservation Nick Smith says the government's sensitivity over Maori spiritual values and its aversion to doing earthworks in the National Park have led to the rejection of a "commonsense solution" to excavate the dam.
"The warning system and bund are an expensive and poor solution that attempts to control the deadly lahar rather than prevent it. They are playing Russian roulette with people's lives in the name of political correctness," he says.
But his successor Chris Carter defends the measures in place and the decision not to put a bulldozer up the mountain to undertake earthworks.
"You can never predict what the outcome of playing on the mountain would be," he said, claiming really comprehensive measures had been taken to provide a long-term solution to the problem.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless