Wanted posters still flutter on police-station walls in Germany for two young Moroccan men believed to have been key members of the Hamburg terrorist cell that led the Sept. 11
attacks.
Over the past two years, German police have minutely examined every clue, and have put on trial two other Moroccan students for complicity in the attacks. Other groups of Islamic radicals in Germany have also felt the heat as police laid bare who knew who.
PHOTO: DPA
But the trail has grown cold. One of the two fugitives, Said Bahaji, 28, reportedly phoned his parents in Morocco in mid-August to say he was well, then hung up.
German investigators maintain that the Sept. 11 plot was devised in Hamburg by a group of eight students who went to Afghanistan to obtain helpers, funds and logistical aid from al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden.
Three of the eight, including cell chief Mohammed Atta, died in the attacks. Mounir al-Motassadeq was jailed in February for 15 years. Alleged member Abdel-Ghani Mzoudi, 30, is currently on trial on 3,066 counts of assisting murder and membership in a terrorist organization.
Over the years, the count of Islamists in the multicultural city has been a fairly steady 1,500, with 200 of them rated as "militant."
Elsewhere in Germany, police have smashed the local branch of al-Tawhid, a Jordan-based radical group said to have al-Qaeda associations. Palestinian Shadi Abdallah, 26, is currently on trial for having been a member. He told the court he renounced its views.
In a setback, prosecutors were denied an arrest warrant for Christian G, 36, a German alleged to have had advance knowledge of the April 11, bombing last year that killed 21 people, 14 of them German tourists, outside a synagogue in Djerba, Tunisia.
Germany revised its anti-terrorism legislation after the attacks to give the government authority to outlaw faith-based groups that had previously been able to claim freedom-of-religion exemption.
The powers were not initially used against Al Qaeda, but another thorn in Berlin's side: Metin Kaplan. The imam and his 1,100-strong Caliphate State movement want to overthrow secular government in Turkey. Berlin now hopes to deport him.
In April this year, despite the furious row over Iraq, the US State Department praised both France and Germany for their efforts in the war on terrorism.
Paris was commended for its assistance in the investigations of Reid and of Zacarias Moussaoui, a French citizen of Moroccan descent who is in US custody on charges of involvement in the Sept. 11 attacks.
Because of a series of bloody terrorist attacks on its soil in the early 1990s, France was not unprepared for the stricter security measures that needed to be imposed after September 2001.
However, two unrelated events more than one year apart added new urgency to its anti-terrorist efforts.
The first was the December 2001 attempt by Briton Richard Reid to destroy an American Airlines plane over the Atlantic by igniting explosives he had concealed in his shoe.
The second was the naming of ambitious, media-savvy Nicolas Sarkozy as France's interior minister after the right-wing victory in the June general elections last year.
Reid had boarded the plane in Paris, and had spent time in the French capital planning his coup. Several months later, a number of people were arrested on suspicion of collaborating with the so-called shoe bomber and of links to Al Qaeda.
Shortly after Sarkozy came into office, French police made a series of lightning raids in the greater Paris area, arresting more than two dozen people suspected of planning terrorist acts in France or elsewhere, or of links to the Tunisia synagogue attack.
Britain has also kept close tabs on its Islamic radicals. The heightened security has not always been welcomed.
From time to time press reports tell of heightened terror alerts around London, and drills have been conducted on the London underground rail system, for example, but phlegmatic Londoners have tended to go about their business as usual.
Most Britons believe their security services are better trained and more effective than those in the US, but the government is not being complacent.
The earthquake that struck last Wednesday was tragic. As of this writing, 12 are dead, over 1000 injured and 18 are worryingly, still missing. Though they covered these facts, the international press mostly marveled at Taiwan’s response, using words like “resilient” and “well prepared.” Even the Japanese, with their own extensive experience with seismic activity, were impressed by the enclosed blue shelters set up in a school gym, which offered to those rendered homeless privacy and dignity, rather than the typical rows of bunks. A CNN reporter on the scene, with a partially-collapsed building dramatically posed in the background, was
Ten years ago today civil society activists were occupying the legislature, bolstered by tens and sometimes hundreds of thousands of protesters in the streets nearby, in what came to be called the Sunflower movement. They quite possibly saved Taiwan’s sovereignty and even its democracy. There are a considerable number of retrospective pieces being written to commemorate the decade mark. Almost all describe what happened and some of the ramifications in domestic politics. There is surprisingly little discussion of why they did what they did, and the ramifications if they had failed. This is of far more import. The Sunflower movement
Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁), current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) heavyweight legislator and longtime “King of Hualien,” has been a busy man. Last month he proposed a draft statute that would govern the construction of a highway through the Rift Valley between Hualien and Taitung counties. That was accompanied by similar draft proposals for extending the high speed rail system around the island and for pushing Freeway No. 6 through the mountains to Hualien. That last proposal echoed former Taichung mayor Jason Hu’s (胡志強) old proposal for a tunnel through the Central Mountain Range to link Fu’s birthplace, Taichung, with his current
April 8 to April 15 Westerners in the late 1800s had such a poor opinion of Taiwan that they were often shocked that Patrick Manson managed to spend five years here. “Good heavens, how could you exist for so long in an outlandish hole? You could have no society there, no amusements, a blazing sun and murderous savages,” they would say, and when Manson tried to explain that he actually liked living there, they pitied him, doubting his “truthfulness or sanity.” “If a man derives his pleasure from billiards, good dinners, small talk, a game at whist and the latest novel — he