Patriotism isn't a dirty word in Japan.
But six decades after the nation's defeat in World War II, the concept is still a touchy topic -- especially when it comes to what to teach in the nation's schools.
Conservative politicians are nearing their goal of revising a law on the basic aims of education in what would be the first changes since its enactment during the US-led Occupation.
A panel of experts in March urged changing the 1947 law, which aimed to eradicate concepts conducive to militarism and cultivate democracy, to add ideals such as "respect for Japanese tradition and culture" and "love of country and hometown".
The proposals are a far cry from the 1890 Imperial Rescript on Education, which exhorted students to cultivate Confucian virtues such as filial piety for the glory of a divine emperor.
Pupils had to memorize the 315-line edict until 1945.
Still, critics say the changes carry a risky echo of the nationalistic education that underpinned Japanese militarism.
"I think the revisions would be very dangerous ... and would increase the political control of education," said Hidenori Fujita, a professor at International Christian University and a member of the National Commission on Education Reform in 2000.
In a sign of the sensitivities at play, the panel opted for the phrase "love of country" instead of "patriotism", a distinction people elsewhere probably find perplexing.
"Why is the issue so emotive here? It has everything to do with the way things evolved after World War II," said Samuel Shepherd, executive director of the Fulbright Commission in Tokyo.
"I don't feel that there was a proper digestion of the whole war experience," said Shepherd, a former member of an advisory panel to the Education Ministry. "So you have ... great discomfort with anything to do with `love of country' by some groups and the other extreme that identifies strongly with `love of country.'"
Unlike Germany, where school lessons drill the horrors of the Nazi past, Japan has long had trouble grappling with its wartime history and misdeeds, both inside the classroom and out.
Rows have erupted with China and South Korea over textbooks which critics say whitewash Japan's military aggression, as well as over Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's visits to Yasukuni Shrine, where war criminals are honored along with war dead.
Advocates say reform of the education law is overdue.
"There's nothing wrong with the current Fundamental Law on Education, but is it Japan's? It could be a law for any country," said Taro Aso, policy chief for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party and an advocate of the revisions.
"The Japanese education law was written during the extreme situation of the Occupation. But it's been 57 years since the end of the war and in that 57 years has Japanese education got better? I don't think anyone would say that," Aso said.
Critics of the proposals agree Japan's long-admired education system has lots of faults. Academic ability is declining, discipline eroding and the number of dropouts is increasing.
But teaching patriotism, they say, isn't the solution.
"Since the 1980s there have been problems in the schools," said Kyoto Women's University professor Masaaki Noda. "But these are problems of the whole education system, which doesn't give children goals. They are trying to fill the gap with patriotism."
Angst over social ills, such as rising crime, that have accompanied Japan's prolonged economic slump are also at work.
"The idea emerged that children need to be indoctrinated and controlled, and social anxiety made this notion more acceptable," said Yukata Murayama, a lawyer specializing in childrens' rights.
Enactment of any legal changes could be at least a year away since the ruling coalition's number-two partner, the New Komeito Party, is opposed. Many members of the lay Buddhist group which backs New Komeito suffered under wartime state Shintoism.
But the Education Ministry has already introduced new ethics textbooks which show the effects of the conservative campaign.
One such elementary school text, entitled "Notes of the Heart," urges children not only to "value freedom" and "respect the opinions of others" but to "love one's hometown and country."
"Our country is in the midst of intense change," the text says. "While valuing our country's traditions, we must achieve the strength to clear the way to the future."
The Fulbright Commission's Shepherd and others say fears such teachings will result in resurgent militarism are overdone.
But some educators argue the attempt to teach patriotism is anyway misguided.
"Patriotism catches fire in wartime or a national emergency, as we saw when (US President George) Bush's support skyrocketed. But that sort of patriotism is dangerous," said a retired Japanese high-school principal who was 13 when the war ended.
"To avoid this, it is important to give people the right awareness of their country in peacetime," he added.
"But patriotism isn't something you can teach. If teachers get students to think about the future direction their country should take and understand what its history has been, patriotism will emerge naturally."
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless
Approaching her mid-30s, Xiong Yidan reckons that most of her friends are on to their second or even third babies. But Xiong has more than a dozen. There is Lucky, the street dog from Bangkok who jumped into a taxi with her and never left. There is Sophie and Ben, sibling geese, who honk from morning to night. Boop and Pan, both goats, are romantically involved. Dumpling the hedgehog enjoys a belly rub from time to time. The list goes on. Xiong nurtures her brood from her 8,000 square meter farm in Chiang Dao, a mountainous district in northern Thailand’s