In 1603, Dutch ships ventured into the waters of the South China Sea searching for a base from which to open trade with China. They bore the commission and the guns of the then one-year-old Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie (VOC), or the Dutch East India Company, which was working out of a new base in Batavia (now Jakarta), through which it would funnel nearly all Asian trade for the next 200 years.
But access to the riches of East Asia wasn't easy. After Ming dynasty forces kicked the Dutch out of what is now Penghu for the second time in 1624, the European traders were allowed to take possession of a larger island beyond the Penghu archipelago to the west. They settled near present day Tainan on a sandbar islet that they inferred from local speech was called "Tayouan" or "Taywan." The name was eventually used to identify the entire island, but did it also produce an identity?
A case for this historical origin of Taiwan -- and by this I don't just mean an Aboriginal word for some sandbar, but instead the international perception of Taiwan as a place distinct from China -- is advocated in The Birth of Taiwan: Formosa in the Seventeenth Century (
Two years in the planning, the exhibition focuses on the Taiwan of the Dutch colonial era (1624-1662), taking full advantage of the VOC's rich legacy of historical records, maps, trade wares and other sundry artifacts. Its contents include more than 270 pieces from more than 35 museums in Taiwan and Europe. Several are rare and fascinating finds, like a handwritten dictionary that translates Aboriginal names from Sinkanese, a Dutch romanization of an Aboriginal language, into Chinese characters.
The lexicon is just one of many details of a show that offers the most complete and interesting picture of Dutch-occupied Taiwan ever exhibited locally, or for that matter, probably anywhere in the world.
At the time of the Dutch arrival in 1624, little was known about Taiwan. China's court records produced conflicting accounts, and the Portuguese, who never really spent much time in Taiwan even though they christened the "Ihla Formosa" after spying it from a ship three-quarters of a century earlier, depicted it on their maps as a string of three separate islands. Taiwan was not mapped as a single body by Europeans until the first Dutch governor of Taiwan, a man named Snock, in 1625 sent the cartographer Nordeloos to circumnavigate his new territory and map the coastline.
But maps are only one topic explored. Another major element is the introduction of Dutch trade and technology and the transformations that ensued. Under the guidance of a group known as the Seventeen Gentlemen, the VOC's directors in Amsterdam, Taiwan became a Dutch transit hub with major links to both China and Japan. It moved Chinese silks and porcelain, Indonesian pepper and Japanese silver. Taiwan's sugarcane, silk, and skins of the abundant Formosan deer, whose hides were used by the Japanese in the manufacture of samurai armor.
Dutch journals and engravings show an ethnographic interest in the native Formosans, the Aborigines of the Pingpu (平埔) tribe. There were few Chinese settlers in the Taiwan of the 1620s, though by the time the Dutch left that had changed. In a push for development, the new colonists introduced European-style agriculture and imported water buffaloes and plows from China. Han Chinese colonists followed. There were an estimated 40,000 of them by 1662, the year the Dutch were expelled at the hands of Koxinga (鄭成功).
Koxinga was a pirate warlord who rebelled against the encroaching Manchus, maintaining loyalty to the Ming even after the 1644 suicide of its last emperor, Chung Chen (崇禎). In the years that followed he continued to foment resistance in southern China, but a 1659 defeat forced his 1661 retreat to Taiwan. He landed with an army of 25,000 and immediately contested the Dutch, laying siege to the Dutch fort of Zeelandia at Tainan. The Dutch held out for nine months at the cost of 1,600 lives before signing a treaty that allowed them to leave peaceably with the majority of their possessions.
The treaty, an impressive tome of compiled Dutch records from much of the occupation, is on display, as are the 18 terms of surrender proposed by Governor Frederick Coyett and the 16 eventually accepted by Koxinga. The first of them states that both parties shall renounce hostilities and forget all previous conflicts. Predictably, this never happened. A year later, the Dutch returned with 16 men-of-war in an attack that was repelled, and as recently as the fall of 2001, Taiwanese baseball fans were still waving placards bearing Koxinga's likeness while Taiwan and the Netherlands squared off in the 2001 Baseball World Cup.
Unfortunately the exhibition basically ends with the Coyett's 1662 surrender. There is little mention of the Spanish presence in northern Taiwan at Tamsui from 1624-1642 or the Kingdom of Taiwan, which existed under Koxinga's heirs from 1662-1683, ending with the conquest of Taiwan by the Qing. The absences can be accounted for by scarcity of records from those segments of history, especially in comparison to the abundance of VOC records now scattered throughout the world's museums. Also, as the show makes a case for the birth of Taiwan that was separate from China, it would probably not want to finish off with the actual conclusion of the 17th century, a Taiwan under Chinese rule.
The Birth of Taiwan: Formosa in the Seventeenth Century is on display through April 30 at the National Palace Museum (
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless