It is interesting that Myxomycity, an exhibition by contemporary Taiwanese architects at Taipei's Museum of Contemporary Art (MOCA), takes its name from a special class of organism known as slime molds.
Myxomycetes, roughly pronounced "mix-o-my-keets", designate a curious biological group in an indefinite territory between fungi and simple animals. It grows on damp logs and amid forest detritus in Taiwan and many other parts of the world, beginning life as a single-celled amoebae, which instead of splitting into two new organisms, grows into a multi-nuclear plasmodial slime. This slime has the limited ability to ooze from place to place, leaving behind it a kind of shimmering snail-trail of waste. When it finds a good spot, it can produce 1mm or 2mm-tall mushrooms or other fungal forms, which release spores that eventually produce new amoeba to complete the reproductive cycle.
What myxomycetes have to do with Taiwanese architecture, however, is not entirely made clear, especially in this exhibition. Exhibition materials try to explain the link with a few vague or trendy concepts like resistance to evolution, globalization, and redefining identity. But in the end, Myxomycity comes off as a clever pun rather than a well-carried-out metaphor. It's a pity, because the metaphor had potential.
Like the title, the exhibition's success is willy-nilly. But what is valuable about the show and what makes it worth seeing is the ideas put forward, though not always clearly, by the three architects in the show, Cheng Shao Cheng Tao (程紹正韜), Liao Wei-li (廖偉立) and Hsieh Ying-chun (謝英俊) and the curator who grouped them, Roan Ching-yueh (阮慶岳). The four advance ideas for local architecture -- including the aesthetic possibilities of cheap materials, the relationship of architecture to nature and traditional styles, and how to break away from the reinforced concrete box -- that represent important, new ways of thinking about building and buildings, both locally and globally.
Due to good foresight by MOCA, a world/historical context for work of these Taiwan architects is just upstairs in a very good and concurrently running show, Architecture for the New Millennium. It highlights the work of one of the greatest contemporary architects, Frank Gehry, and four other highly influential Southern California architects and firms. By cross-referencing the two shows, you can get an idea of the lineage of certain ideas in contemporary architecture and how local architects have appropriated, translated, and in some cases rejected them.
Koning Eizenburg, for example, is a Southern California firm that has faced entire, large buildings in corrugated aluminum and that once designed a complete house out of plywood. They've very successfully propagated a kind of Ikea architecture, or an architecture that lends beauty to standardized, mass produced materials and knows how to fit in to what's usually already a synthetic environment. So their designs are attractive, but never at the expense of a project's social identity. In other words, their schools always look like schools, their apartments like apartments, and their houses like homes.
Hsieh Ying-chun, in what is easily the best portion of Myxomycity, has applied similar prefab and DIY ideas -- as well as a very community-oriented conscience -- to a housing reconstruction project now underway for victims of Taiwan's September 2000 earthquake. Following the disaster, he won a competition for the rebuilding of an entire village with a plan that was so low budget it generated controversy among contractors and other interested bidders. The plan called for houses to be made of little more than steel frames, plywood and bamboo. In its implementation, the structures have been so easy to make that construction has generally taken one week or less, and labor has been supplied by the affected community, which was largely unemployed following the quake.
RSS