It's only after reading this book for some time that you realize what makes it special. It's a selection of the academic papers read to a conference held at Kaohsiung's National Sun Yat-sen University in May 2000 on the subject of travel. But where is the hideous post-structuralist gobbledygook, the predictable sub-Marxist party line, the familiar intellectual package deal, the wheeling out of mutually self-referring texts by Foucault, Derrida, Lacan, Althusser, Jakobson, Kristeva and the rest (names that will be all too familiar to students who have submitted themselves to this life-threatening straightjacket)? The answer is -- nowhere in sight.
Instead, here are writers who refer to the kind of books disinterested writers write and readers in search of pleasure actually go out and buy. The dank odor of publications produced by academics for their career advancement, and destined to be bought only by reluctant university libraries, and then selectively photocopied and memorized by students with no knowledge of the primary imaginative literature these critics refer to, and so often aim to subvert, undermine and malign, is totally missing from this excellent and fascinating collection.
The illiberal, anti-humanist propaganda that has spread like a cancer through the humanities departments in the past 15 years was either miraculously not represented at this Kaohsiung conference two summers ago, or else -- rather more probably -- has been edited out by this book's enlightened and independent-minded editor.
That Rudolphus Teeuwen is enlightened and independent-minded is made clear by the two items he contributes to the book -- an introduction, and a discerning and very readable essay on Paul Fussell, author of The Great War and Modern Memory and (of more particular reference to the theme of the conference and this book) Abroad: British Literary Traveling Between the Wars.
These 15 essays have been selected by Teeuwen from over 70 papers given at the conference and no doubt some dross (probably a great deal, and real dross given the current state of academia) has been scythed away. Indeed the book is notable, among many other things, for the absence of any lament, which in the circumstances you might expect, for the many other worthy contributions the limited space made it impossible to include. Fairly clearly Teeuwen found just enough jargon-free material to fill his volume, and seized his preferred material with the single-minded doggedness of an enemy of intellectual junk food in all its (actually markedly unvaried) forms.
The result is that you have contributions from -- ?wonder of wonders! -- ?an academic who also writes fiction (Deborah A. Gordon of Wichita State University), another who sees images of journeys in the evolving forms of classical music (George B. Stauffer of Rutgers University), and another, Robin Gerster from Melbourne, who has written a book on Japan marvelously entitled Legless in Ginza (the reference is to Milton's famous line about the blinded and shorn Biblical figure Samson: "Eyeless in Gaza, at the mill with slaves").
Professor Stauffer's essay may be about nothing more complex that setting forth and then returning as a common musical pattern, and Gerster's about Australia's new-found affinity with Asia, together with the phenomenon of "boomerang travel" (half the point of leaving Oz being the pleasure of getting back home again). But the point is that these are independent readers and thinkers writing about Bach cantatas, Asia as a sex destination, John Lennon, Paul Theroux, early Swedish travelers to China -- ?all fascinating subjects, and a million miles from the hermeneutics of the transcendental ego, phenomenology, semiotics and the like. Goodbye to all that, Teeuwen seems to be saying.



