Thus wrote the poet Ezra Pound, in a rough American vernacular in 1925 in his [Canto XIII], with an intention to shock. Kung is K'ung Fu Tzu (551-479 BC), or Confucius as he is known in English.
Needless to say, Pound wasn't the first westerner to be drawn to Confucianism. Nevertheless, he had difficulty finding an English translation of the [Analects] so had to use a version in French, dating from 1841. He rendered passages impressionistically into English verse and arranged them into an artistically evocative sequence. It's even possible he homed in on Confucius largely because his writings were so widely neglected in the West, just as -- according to fellow poet W.B. Yeats -- he fed the stray cats in his adopted Italian home of Rapallo, not because he liked cats but because everybody else in the town despised them.
But Pound was nothing if not an eccentric and an individualist. For the most part, when religious belief began to wane in the West in the early 20th century and seekers after enlightenment turned to the East, they looked to Buddhism. Only the occasional sober inquirer lighted on the teachings of this less otherworldly oriental sage, almost the Buddha's exact contemporary.
This isn't surprising. Most of these western seekers were young, and Confucianism looks at first glance distinctly like a belief-system for old men. For when India was turning to meditation among the Himalayan snows, the rejection of the world, and spiritual transcendence, China was listening to a teacher who encouraged order, good government, and sound family values.
Another problem confronting the renegades from western belief-systems was that Confucianism had long been a state cult. This wasn't at all to the taste of iconoclastic rebels.
Nevertheless, some branches of the tradition did influence the young of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Richard Wilhelm's translation of the I Ching (Book of Changes) -- one of the Confucian [Five Classics], with appendices attributed to Confucius himself -- had zealots casting coins and reading their fortunes from San Francisco to Delhi, and London to Kathmandu.
An Introduction to Confucianism is a timely new survey of the subject, and if it is not an easy read, nevertheless it is complex because the subject itself is complex. There is no mindless attempt at dumbing down.
The author is a former mainlander who is now a professor at a small university college in central Wales, UK. One can imagine him working away at his manuscript, collating references, adding to his bibliography, while the rain drips off the leaves, just like the traditional scholar in an old Chinese painting.
The Protestant world too had expressed an occasional interest in this remote set of ideas, mostly prompted by the fact that Confucians didn't worship idols. Xinzhong Yao even quotes the German existentialist philosopher Karl Jaspers as saying that "In the 19th and 20th centuries it was not rare for Protestant missionaries in China to be so overwhelmed by the profundity of Chinese thought that they would reverse their role and return to the West, so to speak, as `Chinese missionaries'".
But the Confucian system is, anyway, not irreligious. It sees state power as an extension of heavenly order and harmony. It simply doesn't enter into the nature of the gods in too much detail. They are inscrutable, and better kept as a mystery. But this is not to imply that they don't exist.
RSS