A lot of heated debate has centered on whether a referendum on the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市), should be expressed in positive or negative terms. The public wants to know whether there are any alternatives, given the high risks involved with nuclear power.
Unfortunately, the government and the opposition have not been able to provide the public with the information it needs. Each has stuck to its own guns and no consensus has been reached. The debate will undoubtedly continue even after the referendum, sowing the seeds of further social conflict.
The nation imports more than 99 percent of its energy supplies and, as a result, fluctuations in world oil prices have a huge effect on the domestic economy. The public is still reeling from last year’s twin hikes in fuel and electricity prices.
Countries around the world are working hard to promote the research and development of renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, hydroelectric, tidal, biomass and ocean thermal energy conversion. They are doing this because renewable energy resources are unlimited and widely available, and create a smaller carbon footprint.
Taiwan has a low usage rate of renewable energy, accounting for less than 1 percent of its total energy supply. The nation needs to develop renewable energy more aggressively, but should focus on one that fits its situation.
Biogas — a technology that uses biomass to produce electricity, is environmentally friendly and conserves energy — is a good example.
It involves taking huge amounts of agricultural organic waste, human and animal excrement, hay and household trash, and then, using anaerobic fermentation, turning these into biogas to power generators and produce electricity. The energy produced can provide electricity for homes, thereby cutting down energy consumption. It also solves the problem of pollution on farms due to the waste that is a by-product from livestock and poultry.
Compared with wind and solar power, biogas has many advantages, including convenience, as it is less affected by weather and environmental factors, and is cheaper to set up.
Research shows that a small wind power device costs three to four times more than a small biogas power generator that yields the same amount of power, while a solar power device is more than 22 times more expensive. The costs associated with biogas are mainly decided by things like the equipment used, gas surplus, gas production rate, the rate of electricity self-sufficiency and the materials used.
Germany is not only a world leader in environmental protection, it is also one of the most successful when it comes to biogas development.
Most German livestock breeders have biogas installations to turn large amounts of organic waste — one 500kg cow can produce 45kg of organic fertilizer daily — into electricity and thermal energy, as well as low-priced, high-quality fertilizer that can be used in place of petrochemical fertilizer, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
By doing so, farmers can satisfy their own electricity and heating needs, while the surplus power can be sold to the government in exchange for renewable energy subsidies. The Taiwanese government would do well to take a closer look at the German model. Animal husbandry is an important part of the nation’s agricultural industry, with average annual gross production exceeding NT$100 billion (US$3.4 billion), making it an important source of income in rural areas.
However, the wastewater, other waste products and noxious odors created during the breeding process have often drawn the ire of the public. In many rural areas, excrement from pig pens end up in septic tanks, which are then flushed out into rivers without being processed, causing severe pollution.
To solve this problem, the government tried promoting biogas electricity generation by providing equipment subsidies. However, the results fell short of expectations due to limitations in technology, equipment, scale and funding and the relatively low price of other types of electricity. With few farmers willing to adopt this model, the government stopped promoting this policy.
A Danish expert visiting Taiwan recently to provide assistance said that Taiwan is 40 years behind Denmark in terms of excrement processing technology, with equipment used to collect biogas easily breaking down, making biogas generation more difficult.
Making biogas an energy source for industrial use requires more comprehensive planning and cooperation between industry and academia to improve research and development on production technologies, such as raising the electricity transformation ratio from pig excrement biogas and developing equipment suitable to the scale of Taiwan’s animal husbandry industry.
There is also a need to train biogas technicians, establish a good service system, set up value chain clusters, draw up supporting measures and regulations to encourage farmers and educate the public about the industry. This would help make biogas electricity production one of the nation’s main sources of electricity, while also improving environmental and economic conditions in rural areas.
What is the government waiting for?
Du Yu is a member of the Chen-Li task force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Drew Cameron