China on Wednesday announced that it was revoking the press credentials of three Wall Street Journal (WSJ) correspondents over the headline of a Feb. 3 opinion piece that Beijing said was racist.
While governments have the right to determine who they allow in to work, the timing and rationale given for the expulsions demonstrate yet again the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) antipathy toward freedom of speech, free press and the truth.
At issue is a column titled “China is the Real Sick Man of Asia” by Walter Russell Mead, the James Clarke Chace professor of foreign affairs and humanities at Bard College and a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute think tank, in which he criticized the initial Chinese response to the emergence of a new coronavirus in Wuhan. Mead described the Wuhan government as “secretive and self-serving,” and the response by national authorities as vigorous, but ineffective. He also questioned the long-term strength and stability of the Chinese financial markets and economy.
He ended by citing the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks on the US, the election of US President Donald Trump and Brexit as other examples of low-probability, high-impact events that have reshaped the world order, and said that the current “coronavirus is unlikely to be the last to materialize in China.”
Not once did he use the term “sick man of Asia” in the piece. Nevertheless, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Hua Chunying (華春瑩) on Feb. 6 told a news briefing that Mead “should be ashamed of your words, your arrogance, your prejudice and your ignorance.”
Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang (耿爽), in announcing the expulsions on Wednesday, said Mead’s piece had sullied the efforts of the Chinese government and people to fight the epidemic, and the use of such a racially discriminatory title had triggered “indignation and condemnation among the Chinese people and the international community.”
While the headline did draw protests from many Asian Americans for using an archaic stereotype, and Mead’s arguments were criticized for making light of a serious outbreak, the ministry’s statement that the headline had been condemned by the Chinese people is risible, since the only people in China likely to have seen it are those in the government who have clearance to bypass the Great Firewall of China. The WSJ, like most other foreign media, is not sold in China and its Web site is blocked by censors.
Moreover, while none of the three WSJ staff being expelled — Beijing deputy bureau chief Josh Chin (李肇華) and reporters Deng Chao (鄧超) and Philip Wen (溫友正) — had anything to do with Mead’s column, they have written extensively on the crackdown on Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang, and Wen coauthored a story about an Australian probe into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) cousin spending US$40 million at a casino. That story led to Beijing in August last year not renewing the press credential of the other author, Wong Chun Han (王春翰).
More importantly, Geng’s announcement came one day after the Trump administration designated five state-run Chinese news outlets in the US — Xinhua news agency, China Global Television Network, China Radio, the China Daily and Hai Tian Development USA — as foreign missions, which means they must register their US properties and provide Washington with the names of their employees in the US.
Beijing, apparently smarting from weeks of criticism over its handling of the COVID-19 outbreak, was looking to strike back at anyone and the WSJ trio were a convenient target.
Amid criticism of Beijing’s decision to expel the three, Geng on Thursday doubled down, saying that media organizations that spread racial discrimination and maliciously malign China must pay the price.
Calling the Wuhan government “secretive and self-serving,” and Beijing’s initial response to the outbreak “vigorous, but ineffective,” is not malicious, it is the truth. The problem was not with the column’s headline, but with the CCP’s inability to handle events when reality fails to match the party line.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China