In Europe, if you go to a public hospital seeking medical advice, you expect accurate, science-based information. You expect the staff attending you to be professionally trained and certified. You would have similar expectations on university campuses, in schools, women’s shelters or other state-run facilities, right?
Think again. In a new report, the global news site openDemocracy reveals how women and girls are being given “misinformation and manipulation” on an extraordinary scale in “crisis pregnancy centers” (CPCs) around the world.
Supported by powerful US activists with close ties to US President Donald Trump’s administration, and often made to look like health clinics, many of these centers claim to offer pregnant women unbiased “advice.”
Illustration: Yusha
In fact, staff aim to dissuade women from having legal abortions and, in some cases, from accessing contraception.
In the first investigation of its kind, openDemocracy mapped the global spending, networks and activities of two influential anti-abortion groups based in the US, Heartbeat International and Human Life International.
Together, they have spent US$13 million around the world since 2007 and have funded and trained hundreds of organizations globally.
We sent undercover reporters, posing as vulnerable pregnant women, into Heartbeat-affiliated CPCs in 18 countries around the world, where they consistently received wildly misleading and false information.
Abortion can increase cancer risks. A woman needs consent from a partner to have one. Hospitals will not treat medical complications. Women will suffer from a widely debunked “post-abortion syndrome.”
We also sent a reporter to get Heartbeat training, available online or in-person globally. Our reporter was taught to encourage women to delay abortion and emergency contraception.
In these trainings, they also claim that condoms are not effective at preventing pregnancy, and to tell women that abortion increases risk of abuse of other children and could “turn” partners gay.
In the US, there are thousands of CPCs. In the wake of the US Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide, Heartbeat was one of a number of groups that expanded a model that began in response to liberalization of state abortion laws in the 1960s.
Their CPCs have been repeatedly challenged in the US for presenting themselves as neutral health facilities, while hiding their anti-abortion and religious agendas from women seeking help.
However, until now, the global scale of these activities had not been mapped.
The power and influence of US religious conservatives in Latin America and Africa is well known. As a result of the draconian anti-abortion restrictions they have backed, women have been jailed for having miscarriages and thousands die from unsafe abortions every year.
In Uganda, our reporter was told she could never “truly” love and care for any children after an abortion, and might have difficulty conceiving again.
In Argentina, a reporter who said she was in an abusive relationship was told: “Now, you’re a victim, but an abortion would make you part of that violence since you will be violent.”
The scale of these operations in Europe has shocked lawmakers, doctors and health experts. We found more than 400 Heartbeat-affiliated CPCs in Italy alone — and dozens more across Spain, Croatia, Serbia, Romania and Ukraine.
At a CPC inside a Lombardy hospital, our reporter was told that having a baby can cure leukemia.
In Spain, our reporter was given books and articles claiming that abortion causes mental health problems, sterility and heart attacks.
She was also warned that women who have an abortion are “144 percent more likely” to abuse their children.
The organizations that run these centers have both received Heartbeat funding and participated in in-person training. They also receive public funds and political endorsements: in Italy, from far-right former-deputy prime Minister Matteo Salvini; in Spain, from the far-right Vox party.
Neil Datta, secretary of the European Parliamentary Forum for Sexual and Reproductive Rights, finds it highly “disturbing” that foreign groups are “proactively attempting to deprive women of their legal rights … by deliberately deceiving them.”
He calls it “a rule of law issue.”
No policymaker, whatever their position on abortion, should stand by while “their country’s laws are being circumvented through disinformation, emotional manipulation and outright deceit specifically targeting pregnant women,” he said.
What can be done? It is instructive that openDemocracy’s reporters were not fed such extreme falsehoods when they visited CPCs in North America.
In the US, Heartbeat has a “Commitment of Care” which promises that women will always receive “accurate information,” including on abortion and contraception, and to advertising and communication that are “truthful and honest and accurately describe the services we offer.”
While many of Heartbeat’s global affiliates clearly do not follow these rules, it appears that legal pressure and greater scrutiny in the US have had some effect — despite the US’ robust free-speech protections.
That means there is surely room for more ambitious action in the EU. It cannot be right that most EU countries require a license to sell vitamins, but not to offer a pregnant woman an ultrasound.
All of the countries we investigated have laws or regulations prohibiting false or deceptive advertising of goods or services, yet we found no evidence of legal challenges against CPCs under these rules outside of the US.
There are obvious steps to be taken in countries like Italy, where national and regional lawmakers must urgently ban CPCs from public hospitals and — critically — improve provision of accurate, science-based advice, education and healthcare services for women and girls.
The catastrophic lack of such services in Italy has created a vacuum, which religious conservatives have deftly filled.
Notably, many of the clients our reporters saw at Italian CPCs were Roma and migrant women; similarly, in Spain, we observed Latin American migrants in financial difficulty.
Other countries have made some efforts. In 2017, France made it a crime to provide women with false information about abortion, although no cases have yet been brought under this law, and rights groups question its effectiveness.
The same year, Ireland tabled proposals for a new law to regulate counselors, after journalists found staff at a CPC telling women that abortion causes cancer, among other falsehoods.
However, these legislative proposals have now stalled.
There is, rightly, much discussion in Brussels and across European capitals about how to combat fake news online and rein in the power of Big Tech, but the toxic spread of misinformation offline is arguably even more insidious and influential.
Are you more likely to believe something you are told in a hospital or by a trusted member of your community, or an ad on Facebook?
What openDemocracy’s investigation found is likely just the tip of the iceberg.
Heartbeat and Human Life International are part of a larger universe of anti-abortion evangelists targeting vulnerable women and girls globally.
We have found evidence pointing to hundreds more CPCs in other countries, from the Czech Republic to Kenya. The model is cheap — often relying on well-meaning volunteers — and easy to replicate. It is misinformation on a global scale.
Europe must lead the way in putting a stop to it.
Mary Fitzgerald is editor-in-chief of openDemocracy, an independent global media platform covering world affairs, ideas and culture.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry