Following a decision by Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌), the government on Thursday last week implemented a system for purchasing masks during the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbreak that imposes a limit of two masks per week per person to prevent stockpiling, which would deprive people who are in real need.
The policy has been criticized, with some saying that two masks per week is insufficient.
Although the government has repeatedly advised that masks are not necessary except in places such as hospitals or confined spaces, this has not eased the rush to buy masks.
The outbreak has created panic, while local governments implemented measures during the early stages of the epidemic that exacerbated demand. Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) demanded that vendors at traditional markets, and people who enter kindergartens or elementary schools — which have had their post-holiday start pushed back to Feb. 25 — wear masks. Other local administrations followed suit.
While they cannot be blamed for such responses, as adopting the most stringent standards during the early phase of an outbreak can help prevent an epidemic and helps restore public confidence, it did escalate demand for masks.
As Taiwan can only produce 4 million masks per day, it cannot meet the demand.
More than two weeks have passed since Taiwan’s first case of 2019-nCoV infection was reported on Jan. 21, while there were 18 confirmed cases in the nation as of yesterday. While no indigenous cases or community transmission have been reported in Taichung, demand for masks remains high.
On the first day of centralized distribution, 100,000 masks from the city’s daily allocation of 118,000 were immediately sent to local medical personnel, while police officers and frontline civilian service personnel received no such benefits.
The Taichung City Government’s policy was that masks were required in many public spaces. However, they were difficult to obtain.
This shows how the central and local governments fell into a trap set by their own policies, making criticism inevitable.
The central government’s mask-buying policy aimed to alleviate supply issues and it facilitated new lines to increase mask production to 10 million per day.
However, the policies only address the symptom of mask shortages, because as long as panic remains, strict rationing will only elicit a stronger backlash.
The central government has displayed a good grasp and control of the situation, so people should be assured. As the government and medical associations have repeatedly said, masks are not needed at all times. Unless people are going to a medical facility, are potentially in contact with infected people or are in a confined space, there is no need for concern.
A firm understanding of the situation is required. Leave the masks for those who really need them while doing everything possible to prevent the spread of the disease.
Shih Chih-chang is a Taichung city councilor.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under