The 2019 novel coronavirus is spreading across the world, and the epidemic might be with us beyond the short term. During the winter break, schools were fine, but now they must pay attention to epidemic prevention.
The situation is more complex for universities, since that involves Chinese students. Chinese exchange students have been banned, but how about Chinese students who are officially registered at Taiwanese universities?
Even before the Ministry of Education made this decision, several universities had announced that they would postpone the start of school to allow Chinese students time to self-quarantine for 14 days after entering Taiwan. However, the government’s requirement that Chinese students be isolated for two weeks in single rooms is a great challenge to local school resources and personnel.
The easiest way to tackle this issue is to delay the return of Chinese students until the epidemic ends. During this time, students could take courses at nearby Chinese universities and their credits could be recognized by the Taiwanese institutions.
Unfortunately, this requires administrative cooperation with Chinese universities, which is not an easy task, due to the lack of communication between the Taiwanese and Chinese governments. Also, with the convenient online learning systems modern universities possess, arrangements could be made for students to take online courses from outside Taiwan, and they could discuss issues with their Taiwanese teachers through videoconferencing.
As Taiwan allows officially registered Chinese students to enter Taiwan, the 14-day self-quarantine period seems necessary. Still, the education ministry should act boldly and resolutely to ease the burden on universities and simplify related issues.
For example, the education authorities in each local administration could rent business hotels to place Chinese students under self-quarantine in one central location. By doing so, hotels that have suffered financial losses due to the outbreak would at least be able to make some money, and it would also help the tourism industry.
It is of course questionable whether hotels would be willing to serve as temporary shelters for self-quarantined Chinese students, and whether their neighbors would protest, so it would perhaps be less controversial to isolate Chinese students at school dormitories.
However, as the winter break is relatively short in Taiwan, many schools did not ask students to empty their rooms during the break. Although the delayed return to universities to after Feb. 25 would allow Chinese students to isolate themselves in single rooms at school dormitories, how should schools empty students’ rooms? Would such an evacuation lead to complaints? Would they worry about the sterilization of their rooms when they move back in afterward? These are just some of the concerns.
The education ministry should specify a school opening day for all universities and establish rules on how to handle Chinese students, to avoid the chaos caused by local universities each playing their own tune. The easiest and safest strategy would be to suspend Chinese students from entering Taiwan until the epidemic is over.
During this period, Chinese students could continue their education online and thus would not have to suspend their studies. Such courses should be free of charge.
These students should be permitted to take more courses every semester to make up for the time that they would lose with this strategy.
Chang Ruay-shiung is president of National Taipei University of Business.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with