It is called the Extinction Wing. Located in a dark corner of the Paris Museum of Natural History, it houses a haunting collection of species that have long vanished from the natural world. With biodiversity declining faster than at any time in human history, what size museum will future generations need?
We now face a sixth mass extinction, in which an estimated 1 million species are predicted to disappear. Does it matter? We survived the dodo’s demise and, though tragic, will the imminent extinction of the northern rhino really affect our lives?
It will. All living things on our planet depend on healthy and diverse ecosystems for air, water and nutritious food. These same ecosystems regulate the climate and provide the raw materials and resources on which our economies — and lives — depend. The annual global value of natural services each year is estimated to be US$125 trillion.
Yet, biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse are among the biggest risks to economic prosperity and global development, according to the World Economic Forum.
For many, it is a matter of life or death. For all of us, it is an existential threat as far-reaching, complex and urgent as climate change.
The world’s failure to meet almost all of its biodiversity goals highlights how we have underestimated that threat. Humanity wonders at the natural world, but fails to value it.
We pollute ecosystems, exploit their resources with abandon and make them inhospitable.
Too often, we fixate on the threatened extinction of iconic species — the polar bears and koalas whose suffering makes headlines — while ignoring the vast range of organisms we might never see, but which are essential to sustaining the habitats that support and shelter all life, including us.
The most endangered ecosystems are wetlands, including freshwater rivers, lakes, paddies, marshes and peatlands, and saltwater estuaries, mangroves, coral reefs, seagrass beds and lagoons.
We have lost 87 percent of our wetlands in the past 300 years, and 35 percent since 1970. Today, they are disappearing faster than any other ecosystem — three times faster than even forests.
As they vanish, so does the life within them. More than 25 percent of wetland plants and animals — which comprise up to 40 percent of all the world’s species — are at risk of extinction, and stocks of other remaining species are declining rapidly.
The implications of this trend are sobering, given that wetlands are our most valuable ecosystem. Economically, they provide an estimated US$47 trillion worth of services annually and a livelihood for about 1 billion people.
More fundamentally, wetlands clean and store water. At a time when one in three people worldwide lacks access to safe drinking water and water-related conflict is on the rise, protecting these ecosystems saves lives.
It also saves money: Protecting a natural watershed providing clean water to New York City, for example, eliminated the need for a US$10 billion water-treatment plant that would have cost US$100 million per year to run.
Wetlands are also a major source of nutrition, including fish and rice — a staple food on which 3.5 billion people depend.
The world’s largest mangrove restoration in Senegal shows how conserving and restoring wetlands can be a valuable strategy to tackle hunger and poverty. The restoration led to increased biodiversity; higher rice yields; and increased fish, oyster and shrimp stocks. Along with improved food security, surplus catches continue to bring valuable income for villagers.
Wetlands are also among the planet’s most effective carbon sinks and thus play a central role in climate regulation. That is why some countries — such as Scotland and Denmark — have embarked on large-scale peatland restoration, with positive knock-on effects for wildlife.
However, despite the clear evidence, wetlands are largely sidelined in national and global policymaking.
To redress this anomaly, the parties to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity would this year adopt an ambitious global road map to avoid mass species extinction while redefining a future where humans genuinely live in harmony with nature.
Proposed goals — including zero net loss and integrity of ecosystems by 2030 and a 20 percent increase in that area by 2050 — are essential.
This is a critical opportunity to embed specific, measurable targets for protecting wetlands, and it must not be lost.
Commitments already exist to protect and better manage wetland biodiversity, such as the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands.
However, mainstreaming wetlands’ compelling role in global and national solutions concerning biodiversity would provide the impetus for the transformative action needed.
It would also help deliver multiple international goals on climate change and sustainable development.
Future generations should not have to wander around vast extinction museums imagining lost worlds and mourning missed opportunities.
They should not have to struggle to access the vital natural services that our planet is supposed to be able to provide.
Unless we take urgent action to curb the next mass extinction, that will be the future that awaits them.
Martha Rojas Urrego is secretary-general of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations