When a system has only been implemented in just over 30 nations since the 1940s and the nations are located in essentially the same region, there must be a particular background and rationale involved. Moreover, if the system has been opposed for years by international professional organizations, one cannot be too careful.
Public lending rights is a case in point. It is a special system of remuneration that allows authors to be paid when their works are lent through public libraries, but the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions states that it “does not favor the principles of a ’lending right,’ which can jeopardize free access to the services of publicly accessible libraries, which is the citizen’s human right.”
In addition to 29 European countries, only members of the Commonwealth — including Australia, Canada and New Zealand — and Israel have legislated and implemented the system.
The National Taiwan Library and National Library of Public Information were selected to conduct a trial implementation from Jan. 1 of a Taiwanese version of a “public lending right” program, under which the government pays NT$3 to authors and publishers each time their work is borrowed, in the hope of encouraging creativity and promoting publication.
The Taiwanese version of public lending rights, which aspires to become the first of its kind in Asia, is well-intended, but the implementation of the trial version is questionable.
Based on a preliminary assessment that the two libraries would only have to pay out about NT$10 million (US$333,890) per year, an upper payout limit has been removed, although other countries have insisted on one to avoid differences in checkout rates resulting in unbalanced payments.
As the government subsidizes the program through its public affairs budget, the program — serving as a policy tool — should aim to achieve a maximize benefit to society regardless of the size of the budget. Based on this idea, remuneration would naturally incentivize the publication of books in the categories that receive the most in remuneration fees.
However, the principle behind the trial — that everything should be subsidized irrespective of category — determines remuneration recipients based on public taste, instead of subsidizing outstanding publications to enhance the public’s taste.
The annual list of top remuneration recipients would likely show a growing distance from the cultural diversity promoted by the ministries of education and culture. It would be difficult to keep the publishing industry from following the list and focusing more on popular categories than less popular ones.
Lastly, a payment of NT$3 per loan, without consideration of a book’s price, goes against the principle of proportionality. Giving the same loan remuneration to all books is unfair to high-quality publications and does nothing over the long term to encourage publishers to invest in outstanding works.
Despite its eager pursuit of “first in Asia” honors, Taiwan should learn from other countries’ 80 years of experience, instead of rushing headlong into a process of trial and error. As the saying goes: “A miss is as good as a mile.”
The first book-lending remuneration system in Asia should be carefully deliberated and cautiously implemented.
Jerry Hsia is a professor at National Taiwan Normal University and director of its Graduate Institute of Performing Arts, as well as a former member of a public library book selection committee subsidized by the Ministry of Education.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
On Thursday last week, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered a barnstorming speech at the Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum in Yorba Linda, California, titled “Communist China and the Free World’s Future.” The speech set out in no uncertain terms the insoluble ideological divide between a totalitarian, communist China and the democratic, free-market values of the US. It was also a full-throated call to arms for all nations of the free world to rally behind the US and defeat China. Pompeo elaborated on a clear distinction between China and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in an attempt to recalibrate the
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more