Taiwan has laws prohibiting false news and the dissemination of opinion poll results shortly before elections, but to more effectively prevent unwanted influence, there should be a mechanism to flag posts from fake social media accounts.
A report published on the Liberty Times’ (the Taipei Times’ sister paper) Web site on Wednesday said that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Year’s Day speech garnered numerous comments that were critical of her, some offensive.
One commenter wrote: “Look at all these comments critical of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) on a ‘green’ news Web site. The writing is on the wall for the DPP.”
However, clicking on the user’s account revealed what appeared to be a fake account. The profile picture was a graphic and the account had few connections, most of which had Chinese names written in simplified characters, while there were political posts of a dubious nature on its timeline.
Most of the accounts that made the negative comments had similar characteristics. Unfortunately, some people engaged with the posts, seemingly unaware that they were most likely from fake accounts.
Facebook — which provides commenting functionality on the Web sites of the Taipei Times and the Liberty Times, as well as most other news Web sites in Taiwan — has made strides in eliminating false news reports. However, algorithms are imperfect and fact-checking is slow.
“Technology companies like to claim that algorithms are free of personal bias, yet they inevitably reflect the subjective decisions of those who designed them, and journalistic integrity is not a priority for engineers,” Nicky Woolf wrote in a Guardian opinion piece on Nov. 29, 2016.
A BBC report on Sept. 14 last year said that three years later, Facebook is still using an approach that relies on posts to be flagged either by an algorithm or a user, and then reviewed by a human.
Those who disseminate false reports are turning to images and videos to get their message across, and while Facebook has plans to stop those methods more effectively — including on Instagram, which it owns — the BBC report said: “Instagram hopes artificial intelligence will enable it to train algorithms to detect false content in the future, reducing the need for relying on fact-checking services and users.”
Unfortunately, there might be a long wait before such a system bears fruit, while some are skeptical that machines will ever make good decisions on their own.
A better approach might be to make algorithms act in a more subtle, but still proactive, manner. Posts by new accounts, those with few friends, or those with questionable timelines could be flagged and an identifier placed over the account’s username that warns people to use caution when engaging them. The identifiers could be removed if the account is verified, or after it has demonstrated its validity by engaging in more normal usage patterns.
The measures could also be applied to accounts that frequently post on Taiwanese pages, as well as Instagram and YouTube accounts created with foreign IP addresses.
Puma Shen (沈伯洋), an assistant professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate School of Criminology, on Dec. 22 said that China is increasingly targeting Taiwanese through YouTube videos uploaded through foreign IP addresses. An identifier next to such channels would alert Taiwanese to exercise caution.
The government need not censor online content, but it should ensure that Taiwanese are informed when content is from questionable sources.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under