On Monday last week, Yang Hui-ju (楊蕙如), who also goes by the name Slow Yang, was indicted by the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office for allegedly paying a number of people NT$10,000 a month to act as “cyberwarriors” to manipulate public opinion online, including slandering Taiwan’s former representative in Osaka, Su Chii-cherng (蘇啟誠), who later committed suicide.
The prosecutors should be commended for tracking down the primary suspects responsible for spreading the rumors.
Hopefully, they will take advantage of the public mood to intensify their efforts to investigate and prosecute other people who spread disinformation.
It is all too common to encounter malicious fake news on the Internet that denigrates the nation’s head of state and other government officials, or misrepresents policies.
Each time this happens, the government has to place articles in newspapers and deploy its spokespeople on various media in an effort to clarify the situation.
However, rarely do the authorities discover where these fake news stories originate and seldom are the culprits punished.
The usual explanation for this failure is that the use of overseas accounts makes it difficult to find out who is behind the disinformation.
Many politicians and pundits have taken Yang’s case as an opportunity to criticize their targets. In doing so, they are clearly guilty of using a slippery slope fallacy, by which they posit a string of supposed causes and effects, and then intentionally exaggerating the extent of causation between each link in the chain, leading to a dubious conclusion.
This kind of discourse, which rests its outcome on deceptive assertions, is a technique that sophists often use to capture public attention.
In Yang’s case, did her use of cyberwarriors to sway public opinion really contribute to Su’s death? Can it be further extrapolated that this was done at the behest of Representative to Japan Frank Hsieh (謝長廷) and that the Democratic Progressive Party was directing it behind the scenes, and that even President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was involved?
Such an absurdly tenuous string of cause and effect is a trick that pundits often use. If a conclusion could really be drawn from so little evidence, what would happen if a talk show host’s assistant fell into legal trouble for spreading rumors that were detrimental to another political camp?
Would it mean that the host must have known about it and have also broken the law? Would it also mean that a particular politician must also have been deeply involved? Should that politician then have to clarify their relations with the host?
It might simply be that a certain political party buys a large amount of advertisements during the time when this program is broadcast, and that the host loves their position so much that they praise their source of income profusely.
If a pundit swears to stand up for a political party and employs a slippery slope argument based on little or no evidence to criticize and attack an opposing party, then that pundit is either ignorant about logical inference or an incompetent commentator who makes false accusations about other people.
Tsao Yao-chun is a researcher with Transparency International Chinese Taipei.
Translated by Julian Clegg
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more