It is often said that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. It has that luxury, not being constrained by democratic transitions of power.
The prevailing wisdom is that, as far as the “Taiwan issue” is concerned, due to China’s increasing military strength and regional dominance, time is on the CCP’s side. This is true only if all other things remain unchanged. Both Taiwan and the US have committed themselves to maintaining the “status quo” for now, but change could come from other quarters, and not necessarily from the top down.
On Monday, a German Ministry of Foreign Affairs official rejected a petition initiated by a German national, Michael Kreuzberg, asking Berlin to formally recognize Taiwan. The reason, said Petra Sigmund, director-general for Asia and the Pacific at the ministry, was that such a move would run counter to Germany’s “one China” policy, which the ministry has no intention of changing.
This surprised nobody, least of all Kreuzberg, but there are still reasons to take heart from the process.
It was by no means certain the petition would be published at all. The Bundestag’s petitions committee had initially said it would not publish it on its Web site, as it risked causing “damage to international relations or intercultural dialogue” with China.
Kreuzberg responded to that rejection with an appeal, in which he wrote: “The Republic of China is without doubt a sovereign state” in which Taiwanese “freely practice democracy, in contrast to the PRC [People’s Republic of China], which is a one-party dictatorship.”
In an interview, he said: “I grew up in a dictatorship in communist East Germany. I know from personal experience what it means to live under one. The Stasi Secret Police persecuted me. So of course I have sympathy with Taiwan... I think the West should respond.”
Kreuzberg said he initiated the petition because he did not want his country to be responsible for democratic Taiwan being annexed by China’s authoritarian regime.
That, in a nutshell, is Taiwan’s predicament, its international reality. What seems to be a simple matter to the individual — Taiwan is demonstrably sovereign and independent, and Western democracies should support it over totalitarian regimes — is a diplomatic quagmire for states to negotiate.
Nation-states are required to sign up to Beijing’s deluded version of history, suspend their belief, and disregard international law and their own pretensions to protecting justice among nations.
It essentially comes down to a cold choice between profits and morals. If governments cleave to one or the other, they should account for their choice.
This is why the ministry did not want to discuss the issue in a public forum and why Kreuzberg was adamant that it does.
The rejection of the petition could be deemed a lost battle. Perhaps, but that does not mean the war is a lost cause. Something has been achieved.
Kreuzberg fought to have the petition published, and it quickly surpassed the signature threshold to require an official response, initiating debate in the German media about Taiwan’s plight in the face of China’s suppression and aggression.
Through the petition, Kreuzberg also compelled the German government to discuss the issue in a public forum.
Kreuzberg also said that the issue reportedly has support among politicians from several parties, despite the rejection, including German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union.
He said his next move is to take the petition to the EU, because if individual EU members, or the bloc itself, establish diplomatic relations with Taiwan, Germany might follow suit.
If they do, one could no longer argue that time is on Beijing’s side.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.