As Taiwan has become an “aged society,” many people face the issue of having to care for elderly family members, while according to Ministry of Health and Welfare data, more than 400,000 families in Taiwan have at least one disabled family member at home.
Providing care for disabled people is difficult, and Taiwanese should be grateful for the approximately 244,000 migrant workers, known as “migrant domestic workers,” who help families with disabled family members, taking up the heavy burden and responsibility of caring.
These migrant workers — many of them mothers — leave behind children and families in their home countries and come all the way to Taiwan from Indonesia, Vietnam or the Philippines.
Working for an unfamiliar family, most of these domestic helpers struggle alone, starting their day with cleaning, cooking, helping their employers bathe, turning over the bed-ridden, feeding them, assisting them on the toilet, accompanying them to hospital and much more.
They often describe their job with self-mockery, saying that they had to gamble on fate, which is the only thing they can blame when encountering an unkind employer.
Foreign caregivers are the voiceless and silent “housemaids.” Yet how could Taiwan, a nation that is proud of its human rights, allow “fate” to determine the situation for migrant domestic workers?
The Ministry of Labor’s Workforce Development Agency has conducted research into the situation of migrant domestic workers, but every article it publishes takes the employers’ perspective.
Instead of talking with migrant workers, the researches only interview the employers. To understand the inner voice and situation of migrant domestic workers, the Garden of Hope Foundation conducted a small-scale research project in June, distributing a questionnaire on the Internet and interviewing domestic workers face-to-face.
Domestic workers who were given time off or had smartphones could freely fill in the questionnaire, which investigates their labor rights. The foundation received 510 valid samples.
An analysis of the questionnaire shows that 29.61 percent of domestic workers are still paid less than NT$17,000 per month — including base salary and overtime pay — before agencies’ service fee, insurance and other payments are deducted. This is below the legally stipulated basic monthly salary of NT$17,000 for migrant domestic workers.
The most saddening fact revealed by the survey is that 84.31 percent of immigrant care workers have been providing care alone for an extended period of time without being able to find any other caregivers to share the work with so they can rest.
In addition, 39.02 percent said they were unable to rest for eight consecutive hours without interruption. During the three months prior to the survey, March to May, 28.43 percent of immigrant caregivers did not get a single day off, while 17.6 percent only had one day off and 37.45 percent had two to three days off. Only 17.06 percent had more than four days off.
Migrant domestic workers are in a high-pressure, labor-intensive work environment that can constitute exploitation.
People should put themselves in the shoes of migrant workers and start thinking about what the response would be were a Taiwanese to face such treatment.
Could Taiwanese endure such a labor-intensive, high-pressure job, working in an environment where every member of the family issues orders that are difficult to refuse? This kind of situation can make people ill.
Migrant domestic workers are by no means “housemaids” who are forced to work. They need days off and fair treatment, and they also need the government to set reasonable regulations to improve their working conditions.
The UN’s International Labor Organization (ILO) set up the Convention on Domestic Workers to address their situations.
Among Asian nations, only the Philippines has ratified the convention, which requires the ratifying state to enforce a minimum wage to be paid to domestic workers, and that the minimum wage must not be lower than it is for other workers. Taiwan probably has a long way to go before reaching that goal.
Migrant domestic workers are not covered by the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) and there are no laws that guarantee their rights. In 2011, then-Council of Labor Affairs minister Jennifer Wang (王如玄) led the formulation of a domestic worker protection bill. The council has since been upgraded to the Ministry of Labor.
The draft is comprehensive, stipulating employer-employee relationships, wages and days off. Unfortunately, the draft was shelved after it was sent to the Executive Yuan for review. The Ministry of Labor only proposes “directions to be noted concerning household laborers,” which is still under discussion. The ministry is essentially shirking its responsibilities.
As Taiwan has officially joined the ranks of aged nations, there is an urgent demand for a huge home care workforce. The labor ministry should commit itself to the responsibility of setting up friendly clauses in regulations to attract a mobile workforce to Taiwan and draw people into the care services.
Chi Hui-jung is the chief executive officer of the Garden of Hope Foundation.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with