As protests in Hong Kong approach their sixth consecutive month, those in charge of the Chinese Communist Party may be regretting they ever took control of the territory — and particularly under a “one country, two systems” arrangement.
With riot police and student demonstrators fighting pitched battles at the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for much of the last week, it appears that the two sides are now locked in a confrontation from which neither sees a plausible exit.
For many of those taking to the streets, they see their actions as central in protecting Hong Kong’s surviving civil liberties, as well as keeping open the hope of future and more democratic reform.
For those in Beijing, making such concessions would undermine much of what has held communist rule together for three quarters of a century. They want the protests over — but with the former British colony a much more open society with continuous media coverage, so far they have clearly felt there are severe limits to the brutality they can unleash.
That the authorities will get more repressive in Hong Kong does not seem in doubt. However, it is striking how Beijing is taking a much more cautious approach than it has with its minority Muslim Uighurs in northwest China.
Leaked documents published by the New York Times a week ago show that officials were instructed on how to handle Uighur students who returned home to find that family members had disappeared into internment or “re-education camps.”
The transcript of a speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) instructed officials to show “no mercy” in what the government portrays as a necessary clampdown on Islamist militancy following a string of violent attacks earlier this decade.
Chinese rhetoric has also hardened in Hong Kong, as has use of physical force, particularly live rounds. The highly publicized use of troops in athletic attire cleaning streets earlier this week appeared to be a veiled threat of a much harsher military crackdown.
Still, so far the nature of Hong Kong’s more open society — particularly the lack of censorship on social and other media — has left the authorities simply unable to act with the impunity they enjoy in China, particularly in its relatively remote Uighur-populated regions.
Indeed, one of the defining dynamics of the current face-off is that both the authorities and protesters know that events have played out in Hong Kong hugely differently from how similar protests might have been handled in mainland China, even in the emerging high-tech megacities, such as Shanghai and Shenzen.
Many of those took inspiration from Hong Kong to emerge as business centers, but they lack even Hong Kong’s rudimentary, heavily controlled democratic systems, while the security forces have many fewer checks on their behavior.
The desperation of Hong Kong residents to retain those fragile liberties — many only granted at the very end of British rule — has been at the heart of these protests since the beginning. Specifically, the prospect of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s (林鄭月娥) proposed extradition bill allowing Hong Kong residents to be deported to the mainland was seen as so dangerous that local opposition was almost universal.
While it has since been shelved, there was talk of Beijing suspending yesterday’s local elections, which suggested a widespread expectation that China would look toward other administrative tools to tighten the screws — which may itself give activists new energy.
For all sides, the stakes are high. Hong Kong’s current “one country, two systems” arrangement is due to expire in 2047. A decade ago, many in Hong Kong and the mainland might have quietly assumed that China itself would have a more democratic character by then, but that now seems unlikely.
For protesters in Hong Kong, that gives further urgency to calls for more liberalization, for some even outright independence. For China, events in Hong Kong have already damaged diplomatic efforts to gain influence and ultimately outright control in Taiwan.
While an ever more brutal crackdown unquestionably hurts Beijing’s image overseas, being seen to bow to public pressure might encourage turmoil in China.
For all its local factors, this year’s Hong Kong unrest has been part of a wider trend ranging from Chile to Lebanon, Iran, India and beyond. While most have specific triggers, behind them sits widespread frustration, particularly amongst younger generations over work, housing and wider opportunities.
In previous decades, such as the 1960s and 1970s, economic recovery and new jobs helped to blunt such spikes in protest, but it is far from clear that would happen in this economic cycle.
That is now doubly true for Hong Kong, suffering an economic downturn due to the unrest — and where student residents in particular know they may be at risk of arrest if they move to the mainland China, the only other location where they have a right to work.
That may leave a situation where some feel they have nothing to lose — even as the government in Beijing worries that everything would unravel if it made even the slightest significant concession.
Peter Apps is a writer on international affairs, globalization, conflict and other issues. He is the founder and executive director of the Project for Study of the 21st Century, a non-national, non-partisan, non-ideological think tank. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.