During an inspection tour of the Taichung Gangbei Jetty Model Sea Fishing Zone earlier this month, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) boasted that she is Taiwan’s most fisher-friendly president. The model sea fishing zone is a first for the nation, and has been heavily promoted and funded behind the scenes by Taiwan International Ports Corp.
Taiwan’s natural and artificial coastline stretches 1,900km and is home to countless fishing spots. However, the Fishing Port Act (漁港法) and the Commercial Port Law (商港法), with few exceptions, basically prohibit fishing within ports and harbors, so anglers are unable to fish on or around harbor jetty walls or are forced to do so illegally by evading coast guard or harbor police patrols.
This problem was highlighted in March when a dispute between anglers and commercial fishers forced the government to take notice.
The Executive Yuan set the scene for the kerfuffle, having pursued a policy of opening up discrete areas within sea ports and commercial harbors to anglers, so long as the locations do not impact upon operations and also satisfy the requirements of fishers. There are 50 such private fishing areas within ports and commercial harbors across the nation.
To comply with the Executive Yuan’s policy, Taiwan International Ports opened up a section of the Gangbei jetty to anglers, and has invested financial and human resources to upgrade the area, including repaving the jetty, installing safety infrastructure, shipping containers, portable toilets and electromechanical equipment for the convenience of anglers. It also arranged for periodic cleaning and management of drift sand within the area.
Also, in a first for the company, a high-quality fishing organization was selected to manage and operate the facilities through an open competition. Taiwan International Ports deserves praise for taking its corporate social responsibility seriously.
Many aspects of the jetty zone, including weather regulations, safety infrastructure, insurance, fees, pedestrian and vehicle management, and environmental cleanup, can be used as a template for the opening up of other sea ports and commercial harbors to anglers.
However, Taiwan International Ports is not in the fishing management business and the jetties of commercial ports have a specific function other than as platforms for anglers.
It would perhaps be better then to explore whether there are other areas of the coastline, away from commercial ports, which might be better suited to private fishing.
Moreover, since the essence of fishing is about interacting with marine life, with interest in sea fishing on the increase and anglers demanding access to more fishing areas, the government must ensure offshore fishing develops in a sustainable way. This will require legislation.
New laws are required so that regulations are in place to establish an organization to manage recreational fishing. Such an organization would be able to promote fishing-related businesses and would have the authority to establish recreational fishing zones.
It would also be able to regulate and promote development of a recreational sea fishing industry so that it can become an important part of the nation’s “blue economy.”
Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) has proposed introducing a policy of “paying respect to the sea.” Enacting a sea fishing law would be an excellent start.
Chen Chung-ling is a professor in National Cheng Kung University’s Institute of Ocean Technology and Marine Affairs.
Translated by Edward Jones
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations