Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) is dancing close to the flames in this election campaign. It will be interesting to see how long he survives as chairman if the KMT’s presidential candidate, Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), loses.
Han is wildly popular among the “Han fans,” but many traditional KMT supporters remain unsure about him. Regardless, Wu courted him for the presidential race, shunning former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) and Hon Hai Precision Industry founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), both of whom might have been safer bets.
Now, with the release of the party’s legislator-at-large nominees list, which underwent a number of revisions to address controversial choices, Wu is taking another gamble. He is betting that a raft of older candidates in line with the KMT’s traditional pro-China sentiments will attract the votes needed for the party to regain a legislative majority.
However many of the nominees remain problematic.
The most contentious selections on the initial list were former KMT legislator Chiu Yi (邱毅), retired lieutenant general Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷), retired National Police University associate professor Yeh Yu-lan (葉毓蘭) and Wu Den-yih himself.
Chiu, who later withdrew his name, previously supported China’s annexation of Taiwan through military means. Wu Sz-huai’s loyalty to Taiwan has been questioned since he attended a 2016 event in Beijing, featuring a speech by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), and was seen standing during a rendition of the Chinese national anthem. Yeh has caused controversy by calling Hong Kong pro-democracy protestors “rioters.”
The higher on the list a nominee’s name is, the better the chance they have of getting a seat. Yeh is positioned at No. 2, Wu Sz-huai at No. 4 and Wu Den-yih at No. 14, down from No. 10 on the initial list, which had opened him up to accusations of abuse of power. Chiu had been at No. 8.
Nominees are a strong indication of a party’s priorities and intended trajectory. The polemic nature of Wu Sz-huai, Yeh and Chiu was exacerbated by their high placement on the list.
Wu Den-yih has defended the list, saying in an interview on Tuesday that the process was the most open, transparent and fair in the party’s history, as well as devoid of favoritism and self-interest. He also suggested that the party was up in the opinion polls since its release.
Tell that to Chu, who on Monday said that the list had harmed Han’s campaign and might even negatively impact KMT candidates vying for seats in electoral districts.
Or tell it to former premier Simon Chang (張善政), Han’s pick for vice president, who yesterday refused to endorse the list, suggesting that voters unhappy with it could vote for another party.
According to a TVBS poll on voter intentions following the list’s release, 33 percent of respondents said they support the KMT, 4 percentage points down from the previous poll, while a United Daily News poll released on Monday found that 44 percent of respondents had decided which of the main parties to vote for, of whom 29 percent said they would vote for the KMT, which was down from 59 percent in a September poll.
Wu Den-yih is gambling on his party winning the presidency and a legislative majority with a maverick presidential candidate and a controversial, pro-China selection of legislator-at-large choices.
Yet he is in a bit of a predicament: If Han loses, Wu would almost certainly take the fall as KMT chairman, but if Han wins, he would most likely push for the party chairmanship himself.
However, Wu has an ace up his sleeve. If he is elected as a legislator, he would remain in a position of influence. Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has also suggested that Wu has his eyes set on becoming legislative speaker.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.