The presidential election is less than two months away, but the chances of winning for Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate, do not look promising, judging from the people around me.
Granted, voters whose political inclination leans toward the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) will certainly not vote for Han, but even academics, lawyers and entrepreneurs who have long supported the KMT shake their heads in disapproval upon the mention of Han and wonder why the party would nominate a person who constantly uses vulgar language and recklessly writes checks that bounce, instead of choosing Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) or former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫).
Many pan-blue camp supporters have started to find Han disagreeable, thinking that he brings shame to them. The sentiments are more negative than those they had against Sean Lien (連勝文), the party’s candidate in the 2014 Taipei mayoral election.
Taiwanese voters tend to be influenced by loyalty, personal preference or benefits, and they are easily guided by charismatic political leaders. Regardless of their discontent or reluctance, they would still cast ballots.
However, since the 2008 presidential election, voters have gradually become “rational citizens,” as evidenced by some of the pan-green camp supporters who would rather not vote for the DPP candidate than vote “while holding back their tears” so as to give the party a hard lesson after former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and his family were embroiled in corruption scandals, which struck a huge blow to Chen’s — and the DPP’s — images.
During the 2014 Taipei mayoral election, the KMT nominated Lien, who had no political experience, simply because he is the son of former vice president Lien Chan (連戰). So unpopular was the decision that pan-blue camp voters supported then-independent candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
Many KMT supporters also said that their support is not blind and inexhaustible — “we will give the party a hard lesson if it goes too far.”
Having evolved from voting “while holding back their tears” to not voting “while holding back their tears,” some voters in Taiwan are moving toward becoming “citizens.” Under such a transformation, political parties can no longer win votes through mere mobilization and ideology — they also need political achievements and good candidates to garner support.
Supporters might not necessarily do an about-face and vote for another party, but if they stay at home on election day, it would still have a tremendous effect on the blue, green and white camps.
Not casting a ballot for a candidate one dislikes is an important development for Taiwan’s gradually maturing democracy.
Han is making a great impact on Taiwan during this election campaign. He is skilled at campaigning and manipulating political language, but as Taiwan enjoys freedom of expression, he has the right to do so. At the same time, Han’s statements and actions are also subject to a high level of scrutiny.
Over the past several months, people have been wondering why Han’s popularity has taken a downturn, why he has lost his lead over President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and fallen 18 percentage points, and whether he is failing to live up to the expectations of Kaohsiung residents, throwing his hat into the ring before proving his mettle as mayor.
After his win, he turned his back on KMT Legislator Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) and former Kaohsiung County commissioner Yang Chiu-hsing (楊秋興), both of whom made great efforts to help him win the election, which makes one wonder if Han burns important bridges.
His use of vulgar language and careless political pledges make people think he has no respect for basic manners and that he is an irresponsible politician. It was not without reason that People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), before announcing his own presidential bid, said that Han is “good at lying.”
If Han loses the election in January, that would open up the KMT and the pan-blue camp — which have gone too long without reform — to review and evaluate their future direction. If Han wins the election, will Taiwan be thrown into endless chaos by him and his supporters’ narrow-mindedness, or will Taiwan’s future be decided by traditional voters and citizens hoping for reform?
There is a vast difference between success and failure.
Wei Chien-feng is a lawyer.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry