The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) excels at semantic gymnastics, somehow transforming nonsensical ideas into flawless logic.
It is a craft exemplified by the story of the shameless diner who asks for a steamed bun and then revises his order to a bowl of noodles, eats the noodles and then goes to leave without paying. The restaurant owner asks him to pay up, but he says that he had exchanged the noodles for a bun and saw no reason why he needed to pay up. The owner asks him to pay for the bun instead, but the diner says that he had not eaten it.
It is difficult to fault his logic, but you know he is making no sense.
It is easy to feel the same frustration listening to Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate.
He borrows the CCP’s rhetorical devices to massage the madness emerging from his mouth.
The KMT had a taste of the CCP’s underhanded tactics before, when it was still in China. After the Second Sino-Japanese War, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) invited Mao Zedong (毛澤東) to take part in the Chongqing Negotiations and asked a confidante serving in Hunan Province to act as his delegate to persuade Mao to stand down.
Chiang had no idea that Mao would try to get into his delegate’s head, and sow divisions between him and the KMT leader. Apparently, Mao told him how poor the people of Hunan were and that it was the people of Guangdong Province who fomented revolution, but it was the people of Hunan who spilled blood, while the people of Zhejiang Province gave out commands.
Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) Chinese Revolutionary Party was largely based in Guangdong and in the east, much of the fighting that occurred during the Northern Expedition was in Hunan and the power was mostly held by people hailing from Zhejiang, such as Chiang and Chen Lifu (陳立夫), Mao said.
Mao’s words were very persuasive and had the desired effect of creating divisions. When Mao returned to the north, Chiang’s delegate reportedly bid him a fond farewell.
Han has said that officials in the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have “pale skin and slightly plump figures,” while their KMT counterparts have a “dark complexion and thin physiques,” in a clear attempt to sow class tensions.
A person’s complexion and body size are personal characteristics, and there is no dearth of pale-skinned and portly individuals in the pan-blue camp, so the comparison makes little sense.
Han is using rhetoric to fabricate an association between the DPP and pale skin and large waist sizes, and equating these with corruption and vested interests, which he is attempting to link to DPP figures such as President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦).
He is trying to create a division between the DPP and the public, in anticipation of future class warfare, taking a leaf from the Chinese communists’ playbook.
This is something that everyone must be vigilant against.
In 1945, Chiang, basking in the glory of having defeated the Japanese, enjoyed a numerical superiority over the communist forces and yet Mao was still able to chase him and the KMT out of town. The DPP is in government and has the benefit of its resources; Han is armed with the communists’ deceitful ways and his own rhetorical gifts.
The DPP would do well not to let its guard down and ensure that history does not repeat itself.
Lai Cheng-chang is president of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Paul Cooper
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
This year, India and Taiwan can look back on 25 years of so-called unofficial ties. This provides an occasion to ponder over how they can deepen collaboration and strengthen their relations. This reflection must be free from excitement and agitation caused by the ongoing China-US great power jostling as well as China’s aggressive actions against many of its neighbors, including India. It must be based on long-term trends in bilateral engagement. To begin with, India and Taiwan, thus far, have had relations constituted by various activities, but what needs to be thought about now is whether they can transform their ties
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more
All lives eventually come to an end. Over the years, my friendship with former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) had its ups and downs. Lee’s passing was a heavy blow and has left me deeply saddened. We experienced a lot together and the memories have come flooding back. Lee was born several months earlier than me. During World War II, he was studying at Kyoto Imperial University, but halfway through his studies, he was forced to change his name and enter military service. I was studying at Tokyo Imperial University, but went into hiding to avoid military service, and I was later