With only two months remaining before next year’s presidential election, more negative views of Taiwan’s economic growth and social development are coming from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), even though Taiwanese stocks have continued rising, exceeding 11,500 points last week, and the nation’s GDP growth has been surpassing expectations and may outpace regional trade rivals this year.
Taiwan’s economic development is moving in the right direction, as the US-China trade dispute has been a wake-up call, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government has responded with efforts to entice companies away from China to invest in Taiwan.
Previous governments have tried to entice Taiwanese companies to return home, but to no avail. However, the latest government moves have sparked the biggest-ever wave of fund repatriations. As of Nov. 1, the capital repatriation drive had attracted 47 firms and individuals to apply to bring home NT$21.38 billion (US$703 million) in overseas funds since a repatriation bill took effect on Aug. 15, the Ministry of Finance’s data showed. As of Thursday, 152 companies had committed to investing a combined NT$627 billion under the government’s “Invest Taiwan” campaign, the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
The additional homecoming investment, coupled with fund inflows, could propel all investment from abroad to a new high this year, surpassing the previous record of US$15.4 billion set in 2007.
The UN Conference on Trade and Development in a report last week identified Taiwan as the biggest beneficiary of the US-China trade dispute, and Bloomberg reported that Taiwan’s surprisingly strong year is showing no signs of slowing down.
Many recall that when the DPP first came to power in 2000, it did not stop Taiwanese businesspeople from moving to China. Instead, then-president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) administration replaced the “no haste, be patient” policy promoted by his predecessor Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) with an “active opening and effective management” policy toward China, which lifted more bans on China-bound investment.
The result was the hollowing out of the industrial sector, as manufacturers moved their production base to China due to the magnetic effect of cheap labor.
From an economic perspective, enterprises aim to maximize profits by pursuing a global layout strategy, as globalization is an unavoidable trend, but problems arise when operations leave and no other engine of growth emerges. This inevitably puts pressure on domestic employment and stagnates wages.
That was what happened to Taiwan over the past two decades. Today, there are major changes in the global economic and trade structure, including China’s efforts to control the global manufacturing supply chain and the US-China trade dispute.
China losing its allure as a cost-effective production base is a wake-up call for Taiwanese manufacturers. The US-China trade tensions have made it even more important for Taiwanese businesses to reconsider their operations in China.
It is against this backdrop that President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy and Invest Taiwan campaign have achieved initial results.
It is still unclear if Taiwan’s economic structure and development can be completely transformed this time, as ample room for improvement remains, considering the still-limited growth in employee wages, as well as the preliminary results of industrial upgrading and diversification.
However, what is important is that this is the correct direction for Taiwan’s economy. Policymakers need to continue working on how to develop high-value-added industries in both manufacturing and service-oriented sectors, while enterprises make an effort to move away from the cycle of low-price competition.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry