Civic organizations on Tuesday called for legal amendments to lower the legal age of adulthood from 20 to 18. They pointed out that people aged 18 to 20 are not allowed to open bank accounts or sign up for mobile phone services, despite being subject to full criminal liability and military service.
The question of adulthood has also been raised in Japan, where the voting age for general elections was lowered to 18 in 2016, and the age for referendums last year. In Taiwan, the voting age for referendums was lowered to 18 in 2017, but not so for elections.
This raises the question of what defines adulthood and why certain adult privileges are allowed by law before others are.
An article posted to the Web site The Conversation in July last year said that age alone cannot be used to effectively determine adulthood, as the rates of biological, cognitive and emotional development vary in each individual.
However, those who perceive themselves to be adults tend to score better in certain benchmarks often used to determine adulthood, it said. Unfortunately, such a subjective definition is not usable from a legal perspective.
An article published on Jan. 5 on The Atlantic’s Web site quoted psychology professor Laurence Steinberg as saying: “Chronological age is not a particularly good indicator [of maturity], but it’s something we need to do for practical purposes.”
The human brain stops developing at about age 22 or 23, but learning can continue afterward, and the logical and reasoning components of the brain mature as early as age 16, the article said.
The biggest difference between a 16-year-old and someone much older is the ability to control impulsive behavior, but from a reasoning point of view the 16-year-old is equally capable, it added.
In many countries, including Taiwan, 16 is the age of consent. One might question the logic behind allowing a 16-year-old to engage in sexual intercourse — which could result in parenthood — but not allowing them to vote, purchase cigarettes or alcohol or even open a bank account.
The article stated that parenthood is often given as an answer as to what others consider to be a marker of adulthood.
“It’s not that you can’t be an adult unless you have kids, but for people who do, it often seems to be that flip-the-switch moment,” it said.
However, the way adulthood is defined has real consequences, so lawmakers should aim for consistency in how they define it. Either the age of consent should be raised, or the age of adulthood should be lowered.
Furthermore, if there is to be conscription, then people who are expected to be ready to die for their nation should be at least able to vote for their president.
While every individual physically and emotionally matures at a different rate, most would argue that engaging in sex, voting, driving, taking out bank loans, buying alcohol and entering military service are all actions that adults engage in. It makes little sense to allow or require one to engage in a select few of these things while disallowing them from engaging in the others.
An article posted to the Web site of US broadcaster PBS in April last year asked whether 16-year-olds should be allowed to vote. Council of the District of Columbia Representative Charles Allen in 2015 tried, unsuccessfully, to pass a bill to that effect, but the issue has come up again as more teens are engaging in protests and petitioning US lawmakers on issues such as gun violence, it said.
While the idea of letting 16-year-olds vote would likely face opposition in Taiwan at this time, if people are to define individuals as adults in one context, they should treat them as adults in all contexts.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and