Taiwanese university campuses have recently seen several incidents of aggression by groups of Chinese students. They damaged a “Lennon wall” at Soochow University and attacked Hong Kong students at I-Shou University and Chinese Culture University, where they pulled one student down from a high ledge.
University authorities have responded to these incidents along the following lines: The perpetrators are repremanded, they apologize and the school either urges them not do it again or imposes a painless “demerit.”
If schools stick to this pattern, they will be condoning Chinese students’ aggression and opening the door to even more thuggish behavior.
This is not to say that anyone should try to privately punish or attack Chinese students for their aggression.
It means that Taiwan should use more systematic and organized methods to prevent and respond to such incidents.
For example, the government should thoroughly investigate the forces behind such incidents, sternly penalize physical violence and help victims take legal action.
The places where public forums like “Lennon walls” are set up should be key points for maintaining campus security. If such issues are not made safe, such actions would tend to escalate, leading to deeper confrontation and sharper clashes.
As well as reviewing the way individual cases are handled, if viewed from the individuals who are in charge of the universities involved, the responses chosen by the school authorities would not come as a surprise.
Take for example Soochow, which handled the vandalism of its “Lennon wall” by convening a “mediation committee.” This half-hearted response is less surprising when one considers that Soochow president Pan Wei-ta (潘維大) gave a speech about China’s Belt and Road Initiative at a juridical forum on cross-strait peaceful development, a pro-unification event.
Another factor behind the school authorities’ lenient responses might have to do with their efforts to enroll Chinese students.
If we take the number of Chinese students studying at higher education institutions in Taiwan this academic year, as published by the Ministry of Education, and add the number of foreign students taking formal degree courses, we find that Chinese students make up 62 percent of all non-Taiwanese students at Soochow, 10.6 percent at I-Shou, 48.1 percent at Chinese Culture University and 51 percent at Shih Hsin University.
Except for the relatively low proportion at I-Shou, Chinese students account for the bulk of non-Taiwanese students at the other three schools.
It would be no surprise to find that these schools’ inaction or lenient penalties in response to these incidents stem from their anxiety that punishing those responsible could affect their recruitment of Chinese students.
The government must therefore more closely scrutinize Chinese students’ applications, and, if necessary, reduce the quota of students from China to prevent large numbers of Chinese students invading Taiwan’s universities, ostensibly to study, but in reality to promote unification.
As for the schools, they should follow the example of Canada’s McMaster University, which revoked the status of its Chinese Students and Scholars Association for surveilling Chinese students on behalf of the Beijing government.
China has begun promoting unification within Taiwan’s education sector. If the nation keeps turning a blind eye on the grounds of “keeping politics out of the campus,” it will amount to colluding with China’s pro-unification strategy of eroding Taiwan-centric education and freedom of speech.
Allan Hsiao studies political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under