In the 19th century, the world was Europeanized. In the 20th century, it was Americanized. Now, it is being Asianized — and much faster than you might think.
Asia’s rise has been swift. Home to more than half of the world’s population, the region has climbed from low- to middle-income status within a single generation. By 2040, it is likely to generate more than 50 percent of world GDP, and could account for nearly 40 percent of global consumption.
New McKinsey Global Institute research shows the extent to which the global center of gravity is shifting toward Asia. Today, the region has an increasing global share of trade, capital, people, knowledge, transport, culture and resources. Of eight types of global cross-border flows, only waste is flowing in the opposite direction, reflecting the decision by China and other Asian countries to reduce imports of garbage from developed countries.
Illustration: Mountain People
Asia now accounts for about one-third of global trade in goods, up from about a quarter 10 years ago. Over roughly the same period, its share of global airline travelers has risen from 33 percent to 40 percent, and its share of capital flows has increased from 13 percent to 23 percent.
Those flows have fueled growth in Asia’s cities. The region is home to 21 of the world’s 30 largest cities and four of the 10 most visited. Some of Asia’s lesser-known cities are now also on investors’ radar.
In Yangon, Myanmar’s commercial capital, greenfield foreign direct investment (FDI) in knowledge-intensive sectors totaled US$2.6 billion in 2017, up from virtually zero in 2007.
Similarly, Bekasi, a smaller city near Jakarta, has emerged as the Detroit of Indonesia — the center of the nation’s automotive and motorcycle industry. Over the last decade, FDI in the city’s manufacturing industry has grown at an average rate of 29 percent per year.
Hyderabad — which generated more than 1,400 patents in 2017 — is quickly catching up with India’s Silicon Valley, Bangalore.
It is not only external flows being channeled into Asia. Dynamic intraregional networks are also driving progress. About 60 percent of Asian countries’ total trade in goods occurs within the region, facilitated by increasingly integrated Asian supply chains. Intraregional funding and investment flows are also increasing, with more than 70 percent of Asian startup funding coming from within the region.
Flows of people — 74 percent of travel within Asia is undertaken by Asians — help to integrate the region as well.
What makes these flows work is Asia’s diversity. In fact, there are at least four “Asias,” each at a different stage of economic development, playing a unique role in the region’s global rise.
The first Asia comprises China, the region’s anchor economy, which provides a connectivity and innovation platform to its neighbors. Between 2013 and 2017, the country accounted for 35 percent of Asia’s total outward FDI, with about one-quarter of that investment going to other Asian economies. Reflecting its rapidly growing innovation capacity, China accounted for 44 percent of the world’s patent applications in 2017.
The second grouping — “Advanced Asia” — also provides technology and capital. With total outward FDI of US$1 trillion, these countries accounted for 54 percent of total regional FDI outflows between 2013 and 2017. South Korea alone provided 33 percent of all FDI flows to Vietnam. Japan accounted for 35 percent of Myanmar’s FDI inflows, and 17 percent of the Philippines’.
Then there is “Emerging Asia,” which comprises a relatively diverse group of small emerging economies that provide not only labor, but also growth potential, owing to rising productivity and consumption. These economies are deeply integrated with their regional neighbors: Their average share of intraregional flows of goods, capital and people is 79 percent, the highest of the four Asias.
By contrast, the fourth grouping — “Frontier Asia and India” — has the lowest average share of intraregional flows, amounting to just 31 percent. This figure — which reflects historic ties to Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and the US — is set to increase, as these economies, which historically were less integrated, forge closer bonds with their Asian neighbors.
This group has a lot to offer, including a relatively young labor force that is capitalizing on the growing Asian import market, and a growing middle class that could serve as a new market for regional exports.
The differences among the four Asias are complementary, making integration a powerful force for progress. For example, as one country’s labor force ages, a country with a younger population fills the gap. The median age of India’s population stood at 27 in 2015, compared to 37 in China and 48 in Japan, and it is expected to reach just 38 by 2050.
Likewise, when wages — and thus manufacturing costs — begin to rise in one country, an economy at an earlier stage of development takes over its low-cost manufacturing activities.
From 2014 to 2017, when China’s share of all labor-intensive emerging-economy exports declined from 55 percent to 52 percent, Vietnam’s share increased by 2.2 percentage points and Cambodia’s by 0.4 percentage points.
For years, observers have breathlessly discussed Asia’s future potential. The future has arrived.
We have entered the “Asian century,” as the author Parag Khanna puts it. There is no turning back.
Jonathan Woetzel is a McKinsey senior partner and a director of the McKinsey Global Institute. Jeongmin Seong is a senior fellow at the McKinsey Global Institute in Shanghai.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under