In the 19th century, the world was Europeanized. In the 20th century, it was Americanized. Now, it is being Asianized — and much faster than you might think.
Asia’s rise has been swift. Home to more than half of the world’s population, the region has climbed from low- to middle-income status within a single generation. By 2040, it is likely to generate more than 50 percent of world GDP, and could account for nearly 40 percent of global consumption.
New McKinsey Global Institute research shows the extent to which the global center of gravity is shifting toward Asia. Today, the region has an increasing global share of trade, capital, people, knowledge, transport, culture and resources. Of eight types of global cross-border flows, only waste is flowing in the opposite direction, reflecting the decision by China and other Asian countries to reduce imports of garbage from developed countries.
Illustration: Mountain People
Asia now accounts for about one-third of global trade in goods, up from about a quarter 10 years ago. Over roughly the same period, its share of global airline travelers has risen from 33 percent to 40 percent, and its share of capital flows has increased from 13 percent to 23 percent.
Those flows have fueled growth in Asia’s cities. The region is home to 21 of the world’s 30 largest cities and four of the 10 most visited. Some of Asia’s lesser-known cities are now also on investors’ radar.
In Yangon, Myanmar’s commercial capital, greenfield foreign direct investment (FDI) in knowledge-intensive sectors totaled US$2.6 billion in 2017, up from virtually zero in 2007.
Similarly, Bekasi, a smaller city near Jakarta, has emerged as the Detroit of Indonesia — the center of the nation’s automotive and motorcycle industry. Over the last decade, FDI in the city’s manufacturing industry has grown at an average rate of 29 percent per year.
Hyderabad — which generated more than 1,400 patents in 2017 — is quickly catching up with India’s Silicon Valley, Bangalore.
It is not only external flows being channeled into Asia. Dynamic intraregional networks are also driving progress. About 60 percent of Asian countries’ total trade in goods occurs within the region, facilitated by increasingly integrated Asian supply chains. Intraregional funding and investment flows are also increasing, with more than 70 percent of Asian startup funding coming from within the region.
Flows of people — 74 percent of travel within Asia is undertaken by Asians — help to integrate the region as well.
What makes these flows work is Asia’s diversity. In fact, there are at least four “Asias,” each at a different stage of economic development, playing a unique role in the region’s global rise.
The first Asia comprises China, the region’s anchor economy, which provides a connectivity and innovation platform to its neighbors. Between 2013 and 2017, the country accounted for 35 percent of Asia’s total outward FDI, with about one-quarter of that investment going to other Asian economies. Reflecting its rapidly growing innovation capacity, China accounted for 44 percent of the world’s patent applications in 2017.
The second grouping — “Advanced Asia” — also provides technology and capital. With total outward FDI of US$1 trillion, these countries accounted for 54 percent of total regional FDI outflows between 2013 and 2017. South Korea alone provided 33 percent of all FDI flows to Vietnam. Japan accounted for 35 percent of Myanmar’s FDI inflows, and 17 percent of the Philippines’.
Then there is “Emerging Asia,” which comprises a relatively diverse group of small emerging economies that provide not only labor, but also growth potential, owing to rising productivity and consumption. These economies are deeply integrated with their regional neighbors: Their average share of intraregional flows of goods, capital and people is 79 percent, the highest of the four Asias.
By contrast, the fourth grouping — “Frontier Asia and India” — has the lowest average share of intraregional flows, amounting to just 31 percent. This figure — which reflects historic ties to Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and the US — is set to increase, as these economies, which historically were less integrated, forge closer bonds with their Asian neighbors.
This group has a lot to offer, including a relatively young labor force that is capitalizing on the growing Asian import market, and a growing middle class that could serve as a new market for regional exports.
The differences among the four Asias are complementary, making integration a powerful force for progress. For example, as one country’s labor force ages, a country with a younger population fills the gap. The median age of India’s population stood at 27 in 2015, compared to 37 in China and 48 in Japan, and it is expected to reach just 38 by 2050.
Likewise, when wages — and thus manufacturing costs — begin to rise in one country, an economy at an earlier stage of development takes over its low-cost manufacturing activities.
From 2014 to 2017, when China’s share of all labor-intensive emerging-economy exports declined from 55 percent to 52 percent, Vietnam’s share increased by 2.2 percentage points and Cambodia’s by 0.4 percentage points.
For years, observers have breathlessly discussed Asia’s future potential. The future has arrived.
We have entered the “Asian century,” as the author Parag Khanna puts it. There is no turning back.
Jonathan Woetzel is a McKinsey senior partner and a director of the McKinsey Global Institute. Jeongmin Seong is a senior fellow at the McKinsey Global Institute in Shanghai.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and