China’s socialist polity has outlasted Soviet communism as a resilient form of authoritarianism, and Oct. 1 was supposed to be a major nationwide celebration of the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China.
Yet no one could have foreseen that the months-long protests in Hong Kong would have prompted people from all walks of life to oppose police cruelty across the territory, gaining international media attention against the backdrop of the carefully staged National Day parade in Beijing.
The escalating protests constitute the most serious crisis facing Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) since he assumed power in 2013. While many Western observers have applauded the spontaneity of the protests by Hong Kongers, little attention has been given to a dramatic change of power relations in the territory’s political landscape.
First of all, the mode of state-society interaction in Hong Kong has shifted from that of being remarkably cooperative to that of being extremely conflictual. Excessive brutality dictates the Hong Kong government’s reaction to peaceful demonstrations.
For months, the riot police have resorted to executive-style violence toward unarmed civilians and have refused to disclose information surrounding the mysterious disappearance and deaths of many arrested activists.
The proliferation of police violence against pro-democracy advocates has eliminated the public’s confidence in government authorities. The most appalling example is of a police officer who deliberately shot a high-school teenager at close range on National Day, the first time live ammunition has been used during the protests. The police prohibited first-aid treatment from being administered to the injured boy and planted evidence on him by replacing the white rubber hose that he carried with an iron bar.
Another notorious case concerns the Hotel Indigo in Wan Chai, which embroiled itself in the crisis and discriminated against people because of their political beliefs. Its management and security team allegedly worked with the riot police and criminal gangs to arrest demonstrators who fled the street violence and sought refuge in the building.
Worse still, Beijing’s determination to maintain top-down autocratic control at the expense of the territory’s self-governing autonomy has made it impossible for all parties to find common ground for negotiation and compromise.
Nonetheless, the months-long resistance reads like a living biblical tale of David and Goliath. Courageous advocates have held flimsy umbrellas to protect themselves from tear gas, police batons and bullets. Their defiance, in the face of deadly threats and attacks, has inspired more people to confront hopeless situations with inner strength and truth.
As a local story in the global struggle for freedom and democracy, the current protests have made history for reasons beyond the public outrage against the morally bankrupt regime of Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥).
Following in the footsteps of the US civil rights struggle and pro-democracy movements in Taiwan, South Korea and the Philippines, the resistance has become an integral part of everyday life, rejecting the authoritarian system that China has put in place to appease Hong Kong’s business elites in the post-colonial era.
Lacking shared values with the territory’s civil society, the only option for Xi and his handpicked political agents is to draw on China’s legalistic tradition of autocracy to coerce Hong Kongers into submission through harsh and repressive measures.
Faced with a mighty socialist state, Hong Kongers appear to be too weak to achieve an immediate political victory, but all is not lost for them. An outpouring of moral support and sympathy has been echoed globally.
Rather than being a haven of shopping and business, Hong Kong symbolizes a massive uprising against the dictatorial state on Chinese soil. Unless China comes to grips with the territory’s legitimate concerns and grievances, it is bound to confront all forms of resistance from Hong Kongers in the future
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is professor of history at Pace University in New York City.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs