When Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison defended the Australian credentials of the first ethnic Chinese person elected to Australia’s parliament as a ruling party member, he apparently won appreciation in some quarters in China.
The member of parliament (MP) in question had come under question in the parliament, largely from the opposition Labor Party, which wanted her to explain why she had not declared, as required, her membership in some of the front organizations of the Chinese Communist Party.
In defense of his party’s MP, Morrison attacked the implied racism in this inquiry, which questioned the patriotism of 1.2 million Australians of Chinese descent.
It is easy to see why it would have been well received in the relevant quarters in China, after all the scandals in the media of foreign (mainly Chinese) interference in Australia.
However, any positive impact from this in Australia’s tense relationship with China was negated by Morrison’s statement — made during his US visit — that was supportive of the US position in the ongoing US-China trade dispute.
Morrison reportedly said that China was no longer a developing country and hence not entitled to special treatment, like preferential tariff and related concessions.
He seemingly supported US President Donald Trump’s position that only a “sustainable outcome” was worth signing between the US and China. Morrison said: “It’s got to be a durable outcome; it’s going to deal with the real issues that are there in their relationship [apparently the entire gamut of it].”
He added: “And I’m quite confident that’s what President [Trump] is seeking to achieve.”
He also reportedly said that Australia would push for strict rules to protect intellectual property, technology transfer or how foreign investment operates.
These are precisely the issues that the US is pushing for in a new trade deal with China. As Trump reportedly said, “The second-largest economy in the world should not be permitted to declare itself ‘a developing country’ in order to game the system at others’ expense.”
Not surprisingly, Beijing is not happy, to put it mildly. This sentiment is best captured in East China University Australia Studies Director Chen Hong’s (陳弘) statement that Australia had played a “pioneering role in an anti-China campaign.”
He added that Australia-China relations had entered a freeze “which in Chinese means a very cold period.”
The question is: Who should take the initiative to unfreeze the relationship?
From China’s viewpoint, it is Australia that started it all with media reports over increasing Chinese interference in Australian political affairs and the follow up legislation to deal with it.
With Australia’s ban on Huawei from participating in Australia’s 5G network for reasons of national security, the relationship became even more tense.
Now, with Morrison questioning the ‘developing nation’ characterization of China with preferential treatment in trade terms, Beijing apparently is not taking it kindly.
Against this backdrop, China might think that Australia would need to do some soul-searching and take the initiative to mend the relationship.
As Chen said, “I think the responsibility [to unfreeze] is totally on the Australian side. China always promotes friendship.”
One way, of course, would be to invite Morrison to visit China to discuss the state of relations between the two countries.
However, China is playing hard to get because, in its view, it is Australia that is responsible for the dive in Australia-China relations.
According to Wang Yiwei (王義桅), a professor at Renmin University in Beijing, an invitation for Morrison to visit China remained out of the question without Australia offering to compromise on Huawei and other issues. In his view, “The thing about any political visit is to do something. Solve the problem first and then visit.”
In other words, Australia would need to follow China’s script for relations to improve.
This was the broad message conveyed by China’s foreign minister Wang Yi (王毅) to his Australian counterpart Marise Payne in a meeting at the UN.
Expressing China’s concerns in a formal meeting, he urged Australia for a “constructive” approach in handling sensitive disputes, apparently referring to the entire gamut of issues from the ban on Huawei to Morrison’s remarks on trade issues.
Morrison has sought to fend off criticism on remarks about China. He said: “The United States is our great ally, China is our comprehensive strategic partner.”
He added, “We continue to maintain that this isn’t a matter of choosing, it is a matter of working closely with both nations in the spirit of both of these histories and those relationships … I reject the binary narrative that keeps being thrust towards me on this … I think it is a very narrow-cast analysis.”
Beijing, though, is unlikely to be impressed by this. Hence, the China-Australia relationship is likely to remain troublesome for quite some time.
Sushil Seth is a commentator based in Australia.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and