As global leaders gathered in New York City for the UN Climate Action Summit last week, it was important to remember that cities are not just convenient settings for our coexistence and dialogue, but also leading sources of greenhouse-gas emissions.
As hubs of employment, trade and innovation, cities are the engines of our economic growth, accounting for more than 80 percent of global GDP. By mid-century, more than 6 billion people — almost 70 percent of the world’s population — will live in urban areas, up from about 4 billion today.
Yet cities already use more than two-thirds of the world’s resources and energy, accounting for more than 70 percent of carbon dioxide emissions. As cities continue to grow, so will these numbers. Between 2011 and 2013, China used more cement in cities development than the US did during the entire 20th century.
The future of our planet, then, depends on how we manage urban development.
In addition to being the biggest contributors to climate change, cities are also among the most at risk, and thus have the most to gain from going green.
With 90 percent of the world’s urban areas on coastlines and at risk from rising sea levels, there is significant work to be done to protect the bulk of the world’s population from these and other climate-related threats.
Cities are where spending on climate action would have the biggest impact. Making cities more compact, connected and coordinated around green policies could yield economic savings of up to US$17 trillion by 2050.
For starters, we must do far more to reduce energy consumption, harmful emissions and air pollution, not least by improving energy efficiency in urban areas.
Given that urban infrastructure is hard to change quickly (and lasts a long time), the time for a new conversation about urbanization is now.
Cities need to develop plans to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, build resilience and involve all relevant sectors of the economy in the shift toward clean energy. Policymakers should be planning for adaptations to existing infrastructure and new long-term investments.
Many cities around the world are already integrating climate goals into their urban-development plans. Copenhagen has emphasized increasing its buildings’ energy efficiency. Bangalore is investing in sustainable transport, and, among other good examples, Mexico City is focused on strengthening the resilience of its most vulnerable residents to extreme weather events.
A growing number of cities have come to realize that climate-friendly policies have immediate benefits in terms of both quality of life and economic growth.
Green investment makes economic sense, because it tends to result in better municipal services, cleaner air and safer water. Indeed, solar energy is now often cheaper than fossil fuels, and plastic recycling — a key to cleaning up our oceans — is a source of steady jobs.
However, cities also need to go further, by recognizing the benefits of a circular economy that minimizes waste.
“The 15 circular steps for cities,” a guide from the European Investment Bank (EIB), shows that cities and their residents have much to gain — including a smaller carbon footprint — from reduced consumption and reuse of resources.
Around the world, international development banks are providing cities with financing and technical assistance for climate-related projects.
For the EIB, the priorities are energy efficiency, renewables, and sustainable transport.
At the same time, governments need to introduce new regulations and offer bigger incentives to get projects off the ground, and to encourage more innovation among businesses.
To that end, we need all stakeholders to be connected and on the same page. City networks such as C40 Cities, Local Governments for Sustainability (better known as ICLEI) and the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy offer a good starting point.
These groups have the power and influence to get the right people around the same table, discussing concrete policies.
For its part, the EIB and the Global Covenant of Mayors have joined forces to help cities finance climate action and build greener cities for future generations.
Under this new partnership, we launched the Global Climate City Challenge a year ago to provide technical assistance that helps prepare and fast-track the financing of urban climate action projects.
After soliciting 145 climate-policy ideas from more than 100 cities around the world, we have selected 20 proposals involving a total investment potential of 1.4 billion euros (US$1.53 billion).
By extending technical assistance and financing for climate projects to cities in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the EU, the program will create jobs, cut energy bills, improve air quality, strengthen the management of waste and wastewater, and build resilience.
To address the critical lack of grant funding necessary to advance projects to a stage where they are ready for feasibility analysis and ultimately investment, the City Climate Finance Gap Fund was launched during the UN Climate Action Summit. It aims to raise more than 100 million euros in grants in order to unlock at least 4 billion euros in projects.
Government and financial leaders who met in New York City should bear in mind that they are not alone. They have the support of a growing global community of mayors, local officials and private-sector leaders who are determined to usher in greener cities for all citizens. Our task is to ensure that these voices are heard.
Emma Navarro is vice president of the European Investment Bank. Nanda Jichkar is mayor of Nagpur, India, and a board member of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry