The Criminal Investigation Bureau late last month raided the premises of a religious group, labeled a cult by investigators, in Taichung where it rescued 19 people who had allegedly been held against their will by the group’s founder, it said in a news conference on Wednesday.
Few would disagree that cults can be harmful and should be investigated by the authorities, but what is the definition of a cult, what makes one bad and why do people join them?
Let’s take Falun Gong as an example. Classified as a cult in China, Falun Gong is not considered such in any other country where it is practiced. It is based on qigong — which focuses on the breath and coordinated body movements — but former Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) outlawed it as an “evil cult,” because it threatens the ideological dominance of the Chinese Communist Party.
Some might define the Taichung group disbanded in last month’s raid as a cult because members were allegedly beaten, but it should be mentioned that flagellation is practiced in many traditions.
Those at some Christian monasteries and convents practice “mortification of the flesh.” Some Shiite Muslims also whip their backs with chains and sharp objects such as knives during the Day of Ashura, to commemorate the Battle of Karbalah and the martyrdom of Imam Hussein. Even in Taiwan, the practice of folk religions sometimes involves spirit mediums called jitong (乩童), who sometimes beat themselves with sharpened objects to demonstrate that a spirit has entered their body.
Is holding people against their will grounds for defining a group as a cult and forcing its disbandment? It might also be possible to challenge this thinking, as, for example, those rescued in Taichung told investigators that they believed the group’s reported founder — a woman surnamed Lin (林) — sought to help them. They believed they were possessed by spirits that Lin could expel.
These people seem to have been indoctrinated, but by what criteria can that judgement be made? Most religions believe in spirits and some believe in possession, so how can these victims’ claims about being possessed be so easily dismissed?
A Guardian article on May 27, 2009, said that psychiatrist and former Harvard professor Robert Jay Lifton defined a group as a “cult” based on three criteria: Cults often have charismatic leaders who have “no meaningful accountability,” have a process of indoctrination and “thought reform” and practice economic, sexual or some other form of exploitation.
Cult leaders are often convicted on charges unrelated to the offenses that they are alleged to have committed — possibly the result of the followers’ indoctrination or the prosecutors’ lack of evidence to formulate a case.
The job of the authorities is to determine when to pursue charges. They also face the challenge of determining what should be protected under religious freedom and what constitutes a malicious organization.
Dissuading would-be members might be the best way of preventing the growth of a cult — but why do people join cults?
An article on the Web site Insider in March last year said that few people consciously join a cult, but are rather drawn in as they seek answers to life’s greatest questions. “By the time people figure out what they’ve actually bought into, their whole life is committed to serving the cult community,” it added.
The best that authorities can do then is to widely publicize the availability of counseling services to the public. At the very least, people should know that hurting themselves, abandoning friends and family and handing over their savings to such organizations is not in their best interest.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations