As a top adviser to Hong Kong’s government, Bernard Chan (陳智思) is searching for any protester who can strike a deal to end more than three months of unrest.
In lunches with demonstrators and chats with friends who oppose the government, Chan often hears that the protests would stop if Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) even met two of the five demands.
However, nobody he meets can guarantee him that others will no longer hit the streets even after she formally withdrew a bill allowing extraditions to China that triggered the protests in June.
“You alone stopping is not enough — who am I negotiating with?” Chan said in an interview on Friday last week, before the latest weekend clashes.
“I can’t even convince the government to come to the table, because they don’t know who we’re dealing with,” he added.
The lack of a clear leader is one of the main reasons the protests have carried on this long and show no end in sight.
For demonstrators, that is by design: During the 2014 Occupy protests, the government was able to arrest key leaders and throw them in jail. Now the groups guard their anonymity and organize in online platforms like Telegram and LIHKG that are difficult to track.
“Some guarantees may be needed to convince protesters’ delegates to show up,” said Jean-Pierre Cabestan, a professor in the Department of Government and International Studies at Hong Kong Baptist University. “On the government side, there is so much foot-dragging that I am not fully convinced that they want to dialogue and much less negotiate, meaning make concessions.”
The protest movement has drawn inspiration from Bruce Lee (李小龍), Hong Kong’s martial arts guru.
Weary of following Occupy’s strategy of holding ground, which led to fatigue among supporters over 79 days and turned its leaders into targets, protesters now follow the kung-fu philosopher’s advice to “empty your mind, be formless, shapeless like water.”
“Now, water can flow or it can crash,” Lee said in a now-famous interview. “Be like water, my friend.
Instead of a non-stop sit-in, demonstrators now organize pop-up events around the territory and quickly scatter to a new location once the police use tear gas.
The strategy was on display when Joshua Wong (黃之鋒), the most prominent Occupy leader, was released from jail on June 17. On that day, protesters gathered in Admiralty, moved to police headquarters in Wan Chai and then turned to the Immigration Department building.
Wong was briefly detained again on Sunday morning.
For Beijing, the nature of the protest has made it hard to quell — and they have sought to blame foreign influences in the US and local agents.
Last month, China’s state-run media referred to four senior Hong Kong democrats as a new “Gang of Four,” recalling allies of Mao Zedong (毛澤東) prosecuted after his death in 1976. Then earlier this month, they rounded up Occupy leaders like Wong.
Albert Ho (何俊仁), a former member of the territory’s Legislative Council who was among those blamed by China for stoking the protests, dismissed any notion that he could influence the demonstrators.
“I hope that I could be so powerful,” he said by telephone. “All of this infuriates those who are in power, and they need to find an explanation and an excuse.”
Hong Kongers are not the first to eschew leadership.
In a 2003 peer-reviewed article, computer scientist Simson Garfinkel traced the concept to at least the 1980s, when white supremacist Louis Beam popularized the term “leaderless resistance” in an essay.
Beam advocated the technique for fighting state tyranny using self-organizing clandestine cells, a strategy he attribute to a US intelligence officer who feared a communist takeover of the US.
The article cited Beam as saying traditional “pyramid-style” liberation armies are dangerous, because the state’s electronic surveillance can reveal the chain of command.
The structure was later used by animal rights activists, environmentalists and Islamic terrorist groups alike, Garfinkel found, even though it rarely achieved political change.
Hong Kong’s protesters scored at least one victory when Lam formally withdrew the extradition law.
However, other demands — a commission of inquiry into alleged police brutality, retraction of the classification of protesters as “rioters,” amnesty for those arrested and universal suffrage — have been rejected.
Lam on Tuesday pleaded for protesters to stop damaging public facilities and said violence risked driving the territory further apart, after a weekend that saw small crowds of demonstrators set fires and vandalize subway stations.
“The escalation and continued violence cannot solve the current problems faced by society,” she said, briefing media before a meeting of Hong Kong’s Executive Council.
On the front lines, protesters access various cells on social media. They share photographs and video in real time, allowing protesters to choose where to go as the situation unfolds.
“Many leaders just come out and they’re not actually representing the voice of many protesters,” said a demonstrator wearing a black gas mask who only gave his surname Wan.
Standing near a bonfire on Saturday last week at a subway station entrance in Central, he said: “There’s no room for negotiation. Most of the protesters agree with the five demands.”
Chan, who advises Lam’s government, estimates that more than 2,000 radicals are controlling the protests, followed by several thousand more who make up a wider core.
However, he is only guessing. Like many in Beijing, he is unconvinced that the movement is entirely void of leadership, or at least some sort of clandestine backing, even though he has no proof.
“It’s a leaderless movement, as we all say, but clearly, someone is doing a damn better job than the government or police,” Chan said.
“I bet there’s somebody, somewhere there. Whether they’re foreign or not, I really have no idea. But I have to say, you cannot just say that this is just a people’s movement. This has got to be way more than that,” he said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this