Changhua Mayor Lin Shih-hsien (林世賢) last week said that a lotus flower sculpture on a roundabout at the intersection of Jhonghua and Heping roads — popularly known as “Sanjiao Park” (三角公園) — should be removed, as residents call it “the ugliest public art installation in history,” the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) reported.
While the epithet might be a bit of an exaggeration, the news does imply that the mayor is resolute. The question is whether he can actually order its removal.
Twelve years ago, the city spent NT$5 million (US$160,000 at the current exchange rate) on the 10m installation, but because it is not a piece of equipment, it cannot be summarily removed.
It would probably have been cheaper if an advertising company had been asked to make it, but it is “public art,” and as we all know, art is priceless.
Regardless of whether the funds came from the balance of the roundabout’s construction budget or only amounted to 1 percent of the total construction cost, it had to be reviewed by a review committee. If it is to be torn down, it will once again have to be decided by the committee.
If art really is priceless, tearing it down should not be allowed. On the other hand, if it is a good piece of art, its value normally increases with time.
Ten years ago, Pingtung Agricultural Biotechnology Park spent NT$12 million on a pumpkin-shaped installation by Japanese artist Yayoi Kusama, and since then the piece’s value has increased to more than NT$100 million.
Public art involves public participation, which makes gauging the public’s reaction possible.
After the lotus flower was completed, 80 percent of people were reportedly opposed to it, saying it was “too ugly.”
In addition, since there is a pool with fountains around the base, water splashes onto the road, making it wet and posing a danger to scooter riders and public safety.
According to a Liberty Times report 10 years ago, then-Changhua mayor Wen Kuo-ming (溫國銘) said that the number of accidents at the intersection had been greatly reduced, and that it was up each person to decide whether the installation was pretty. Wen also expressed a hope that the public would not generalize based on their personal opinions.
Is it possible to avoid generalizations? If public participation is handled properly, it should be.
At the moment, public participation usually only involves measurements. Public opinion polls are often one of the most important parts of this process and might be conducted only after review and construction has finished.
Conducting a poll during the review stage would mean a cautious start, while doing it after construction is completed is beneficial when discussing whether a project has been followed through to the end.
A standardized procedure is also required. The US excels at this process and usually announces poll results to the public.
The Ministry of Culture should have conducted an inventory of public art installations instead of establishing the Public Art Awards. Still, an inventory is not only about counting — reviewing the success or failure of installations is even more important.
An artwork must not be ignored once it has been installed. This is the only way to determine which installations should be awarded and which reviewed.
To gain public trust, an opinion poll should be conducted on the lotus flower installation to acquire actual data. Only then could there be any basis for saying that it is the ugliest piece of public art in history.
To obtain art that is both sublime and caters to the tastes of the general public requires listening to both sides of the argument, so two opinion polls should be conducted: one aimed at the public, the other at experts.
Artwork in fine art museums should be sublime, while public art should cater to the public.
The ministry could take the lead and create a questionnaire for use throughout the nation.
When conducting workshops for local governments, this questionnaire could be used as part of the teaching materials so that the one thing participants remember is not that they can hire consultants to do all the work for them.
Workshops for review committees are also needed, as not everyone necessarily understands that public art is intended to bring about reform. During workshops, the ministry’s vision and approach could be explained in detail, just as a member on a university evaluation committee must be given an explanation and receive a certificate before they are allowed to take up their position.
In the 21 years since public art installations were introduced in Taiwan in 1998, 4,200 pieces have been installed at a cost of NT$7.5 billion.
If no inventory is made of these installations, we will not know how far we have gotten from “ugly.” That is not the way to treat the taxpayers who have paid for this art with their hard work.
Lu Ching-fu is a professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s applied arts department.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with