Days after US President Donald Trump returned from another contentious encounter with his fellow G7 world leaders, a Kremlin-backed TV channel painted a derisive picture of his overtures to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Likening the US president’s staunch defense of his Russian counterpart to a tortuous love affair, the channel aired a mash-up in which Trump’s speeches were pieced together to form the lyrics of Senorita — a summer ballad performed by the US pop stars Shawn Mendes and Camila Cabello.
“I love it when you call me Senorita, I wish I could pretend I didn’t need ya,” Trump appeared to say. “Ooh, I should be running, ooh, you keep me coming for ya.”
Illustration: Mountain People
The segment included images of Putin playing the piano, the pair in sync, much to the chagrin of the EU and members of the US Congress.
Trump’s affinity for Putin and other autocrats has long drawn criticism for upending the norms of US foreign policy and alienating traditional allies, but his pro-Russia posture in Biarritz, France, left former diplomats and national security experts baffled and sounding fresh alarms.
“Trump represents an American foreign policy tradition that we haven’t seen empowered in the presidency since before World War II,” said Daniel Fried, US assistant secretary of state for Europe from 2005 to 2009.
“The last time this kind of thinking was powerful in the United States, it was in the content of the isolationist movement ... the belief that our getting involved in European security was not in America’s interests,” he said. “It’s a cynical view that power is the only measure for success, and I happen to think it’s a dangerous view, because it undervalues the free world.”
Trump signaled his intent to advocate on Putin’s behalf prior to departing for the G7 summit, publicly reiterating his view that Russia should be reinstated to the gathering of the world’s leading industrialized economies.
It was ejected in 2014, as punishment for the annexation of Crimea.
Trump insisted that the Kremlin should have a seat at the table and attributed Russian aggression in eastern Europe to the failures of former US president Barack Obama.
Other leaders, with the exception of Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte, vehemently objected to Trump’s demands.
Within days of his return to Washington, Trump made another move that seemed likely to please Putin: Officials said that the White House was considering blocking US$250 million in military assistance to Ukraine.
That would put Trump at odds with the Pentagon, which designated the funds to help counter pro-Russian separatists backed by the Kremlin.
“Trump’s deference to Putin remains one of Washington’s greatest mysteries,” said Julianne Smith, a former deputy national security adviser to former US vice president Joe Biden. “No one knows for sure whether it’s just Trump’s admiration for Putin’s authoritarian rule or it’s the fact that Trump owes Putin something.”
“Either way, Trump’s refusal to speak ill of Putin or Russia’s aggression in its neighborhood and beyond is eroding US leadership and the transatlantic alliance,” she added.
A two-year investigation led by former special counsel Robert Mueller examined Trump’s ties to Russia, but found insufficient evidence to establish a criminal conspiracy.
However, Mueller did find numerous instances of coordination and disclosed that Trump pursued a business deal in Moscow that could have earned him hundreds of millions of US dollars.
Trump’s fixation with Russia was not the only source of consternation among foreign policy experts this week. He also skipped a discussion in Biarritz dedicated to addressing the climate crisis and fires burning across the southern Amazon.
After Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said he would reject US$20 million in aid agreed to by the G7 nations and meant to combat the fires, Trump sided with Brazil.
“I have gotten to know [Bolsonaro] well in our dealings with Brazil,” he tweeted. “He is working very hard on the Amazon fires and in all respects doing a great job for the people of Brazil — Not easy. He and his country have the full and complete support of the USA!”
Bolsonaro has drawn comparisons to Trump, touting far-right nationalist views and making incendiary comments about women, indigenous groups and other minorities.
Trump has also continued to pick fights with US allies, such as calling off a trip to Denmark after its prime minister dismissed his interest in purchasing Greenland.
“Allies are growing tired of the constant barrage of attacks, especially in light of his praise for authoritarian leaders,” Smith said. “Few in Europe see the two sides of the Atlantic sharing a positive common agenda.”
Trump’s foreign policy has been defined by escalating trade disputes and his withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal, which has dramatically increased tension between Washington and Tehran.
“The end result is that countries are starting to hedge and willingly cozy up to countries like China just in case the relationship with the US continues to deteriorate,” Smith said.
A new study by the Brookings Institution underscored the fragility of the transatlantic relationship when it measured policy success in the age of Trump through “the absence of disasters.”
“The US president and his administration have made their distaste for the European Union and some European allies plain,” the authors wrote.
“The feeling appears to be reciprocated in many European quarters,” they said. “The calm, in other words, is deceptive and unlikely to last.”
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
Chinese strongman Xi Jinping (習近平) hasn’t had a very good spring, either economically or politically. Not that long ago, he seemed to be riding high. The PRC economy had been on a long winning streak of more than six percent annual growth, catapulting the world’s most populous nation into the second-largest power, behind only the United States. Hundreds of millions had been brought out of poverty. Beijing’s military too had emerged as the most powerful in Asia, lagging only behind the US, the long-time leader on the global stage. One can attribute much of the recent downturn to the international economic
Taiwan has for decades singlehandedly borne the brunt of a revanchist, ultra-nationalist China — until now. Ever since Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison had the temerity to call for a transparent, international investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, Beijing has been turning the screws on Canberra. This has included unleashing aggressive “wolf warrior” diplomats to intimidate Australian policymakers, enacting punitive tariffs on its exports, and threatening an embargo on Chinese tourists and students to the nation. A tense situation became more serious on June 19 after Morrison revealed that a “sophisticated state-based actor” — read: China — had launched a
Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) is to be Taiwan’s next representative to the US. Hsiao is well versed in international affairs and Taiwan-US relations. In her days as a student in the US, she was a member of the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA) and served as chief executive of the Democratic Progressive Party’s US mission. She is familiar with a broad spectrum of Taiwanese affairs in the US. FAPA hopes that Hsiao, after taking up her new post, would continue to deepen and normalize relations between Taiwan and the US, and that she would try to get a free-trade agreement