I remember well when Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) unveiled “one country, two systems” nearly 40 years ago. His country was just emerging from decades of turmoil, and he recognized the need to turn inward and restore some predictability to Chinese economic and social life. In order to succeed, he needed to restore China’s credibility abroad. Deng wanted to reassure a skeptical world that his country could be trusted.
He also wanted to establish a path toward regaining Hong Kong and Taiwan as parts of a greater China that had not existed for nearly a hundred years.
Deng had two factors helping him: The shift in American recognition from Taiwan to China on Jan. 1, 1979, and the pending expiration of Great Britain’s 99-year lease on the trading center of Hong Kong, offering the opportunity to champion the Sinic restoration that had thwarted his predecessors in power.
So when British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher sought an extension of her country’s lease on Hong Kong, Deng rolled out his slogan, “one country, two systems.” This was a polite opening bid, indicating while the territory must return to Chinese sovereignty, it could do with credible assurances that the economic and political freedoms Hong Kong had enjoyed under the British would be preserved, even perhaps enhanced, as part of its return to a China determined to regain its former glory.
Mrs. Thatcher was skeptical, but realized she had little choice in the matter. A lease was a lease, and unless both parties agreed to extend its timeline, then London must return Hong Kong to the motherland’s bosom. The Brits saw this as an opportunity to test China’s good faith. It demanded negotiations to set the framework for Hong Kong’s return in 1997.
Taiwan was more reluctant, but it was still reeling from Washington’s severing of diplomatic relations in 1979, triggering a steady stream of similar decisions by other longtime partners in the West. The flames of local patriotism signaled the democratization movement that was to end the Chiang (蔣) family’s domination of local politics. Meanwhile the Taiwan economy was thriving, even as the pie was being more equitably distributed.
After some serious shocks, the Hong Kong economy also began to recover. Chinese reform was good for the traders and financiers of the territory, though many wealthy families began planning their escape to the West, should Hong Kong’s return not play out smoothly.
Tiananmen was a harbinger of troubled times, but China’s rapid economic rise even despite that tragedy offered economic prosperity to people there, as well as in Hong Kong and Taiwan.
Hopes remained high when the formal return of Hong Kong to Chinese sovereignty was celebrated in 1997. This was also a high water mark in Taiwan economic growth, and it was accompanied by an astoundingly smooth shift to democracy there.
So what has happened since then? The political system in China has regressed to even more authoritarian practices at home, and to greater belligerence abroad. Beijing has reneged on its pledges to introduce local autonomy and democracy to the people of Hong Kong, and has ratcheted up military and political pressure across the Taiwan Strait.
President Xi Jinping (習近平), with strikingly authoritarian instincts, has shown utter contempt for the efforts at more open political practices in both Hong Kong and Taipei. No doubt he is frightened that this disease might be contagious. So he has increased his bullying of Taiwan, and now has inflamed democratic passions in Hong Kong.
It may be too late for the people of Hong Kong to salvage something from their push for a more open political system there. But the lesson for Taiwan’s 23 million citizens is different. Build your defenses, solidify your relations with your essential security partner, America, and make it clear you will fight for your freedom. Would that the people of Hong Kong had that option!
Ambassador Stephen M. Young (ret.) lived in Kaohsiung as a boy over 50 years ago, and served at the AIT four times: as a young consular officer (1981-’82), as a language student (1989-’90), as Deputy Director (1998-2001) and as Director (2006-’9). He visits often and writes regularly about Taiwan matters. Young was also US Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan and Consul General to Hong Kong during his 33-year career as a foreign service officer. He has a BA from Wesleyan University and a PhD from the University of Chicago.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under