Han under microscope
During questioning by city councilors, Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has been repeatedly shown up to be a country bumpkin who is completely out of his depth. Han’s latest endeavor is to turn his ignorance of mayoral politics into a supposed money-making scheme for Kaohsiung’s hapless residents.
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Review Committee member Chen Hung-chang (陳宏昌) has claimed that Han spent most of his time playing mahjong, drinking and womanizing and it was later shown that this is not a thing of the past. Han’s true colors have been revealed for all to see.
Kaohsiung Department of Tourism Director Peter Pan (潘恆旭) this month announced that the city will host a national mahjong championship in December, which he claimed would boost the local economy. The announcement was clearly intended as a smokescreen by Han’s campaign team to divert attention away from the embarrassing headlines with the help of Han’s frenzied supporters.
What the public really cares about is the quality of their mayor’s character. Han has claimed that he had not once played mahjong after becoming mayor. Having subsequently been found out through an incriminating photograph of him playing mahjong while on holiday in Bali, Indonesia, he is now trying to reframe the debate away from whether he lied into a defense of playing mahjong.
Han turned around a political career of mediocrity and failure to win the Kaohsiung mayoralty through a series of lies. Having found this modus operandi to be successful, he is now organizing a mahjong championship when he should really organize a “tournament of deceit.”
Perhaps, Han will grace the competition with his presence and teach us the tricks of his trade.
Lin Chun-fa
Taichung
Chang Kuo-tsai (張國財) apparently has ample time since his retirement to construct mind-boggling, over-the-top mudslinging targeting Han Kuo-yu and has cobbled together a remarkably snarky condemnation of him (“Han’s old life coming back to haunt him,” Aug. 22, page 8).
While I am not eligible to vote in the presidential election, I try to stay reasonably informed on the potential leaders of my favorite country, as the outcome of the election will determine the course that Taiwan will embark upon in the future.
We are all human beings — all of us — and our ascent into adulthood and (theoretically) maturity has been a series of “lessons learned.”
So Han played mahjong. So did my wife’s mother and I had the greatest amount of respect for her for all the years that I had the great good fortune to know her.
So Han partook of alcoholic beverages. As I watch the daily news from around the world, I inevitably see portrayed highly respected governmental leaders raising a glass in salute to someone or something.
Let’s take a restrained deep breath and focus our attention on the professional capabilities of each of the candidates who aspires to be the elected leader of Taiwan.
Has he or she shown an ability to take the long view and to inspire others to work in support of measures that will benefit the nation?
Will his or her leadership raise Taiwan’s stature as a progressive world leader to the next well-deserved level?
Finally, let’s try a little moderation in our eagerness to condemn others who aspire to be leaders. The past is the past. Let’s focus on the future.
Kirk Hazlett
Tampa, Florida
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.