A year has passed since the Congolese Ministry of Health declared a new outbreak of Ebola in the northeast of the country. Yet, far from being contained, the outbreak has become the Democratic Republic of the Congo’s (DR Congo) second in five years to be classified by the WHO as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, the most severe designation — used just four times previously — that the WHO can make.
It is the second-largest Ebola outbreak ever recorded.
A highly effective experimental vaccine against Ebola is available and teams on the ground are working hard to bring the virus under control, but with the outbreak occurring within a volatile conflict zone, the odds are stacked against them.
In the first seven months of this year, 198 attacks were carried out against healthcare workers or Ebola treatment facilities, leaving seven dead and 58 injured.
Yet, the failure to contain the crisis reflects shortcomings that extend far beyond the DR Congo. Even as large-scale epidemics proliferate, the international community continues to get even the most basic aspects of prevention and preparedness wrong. When it comes to a disease like Ebola — which is highly communicable and has a mortality rate of about 50 percent — such lapses have devastating consequences.
Consider hygiene and water supply — the first line of defense against infection. East Africa has some of the world’s poorest clean-water coverage for healthcare facilities.
According to data from the WHO and the UN International Children’s Emergency Fund, 30 percent of Uganda’s hospitals have only limited water service, meaning that water has to be brought onto the premises. For healthcare facilities other than hospitals, that figure rises to 54 percent.
The situation in the DR Congo is even more dire: Fifteen percent of hospitals and 51 percent of non-hospital healthcare facilities have no water service at all.
Without readily available clean water for washing beds and protective equipment, or adequate facilities for workers to use to keep their hands sufficiently clean, health centers not only fail to treat and cure people effectively, but they become sources of disease.
In the case of Ebola, such conditions can cause thousands to become infected and die, with a knock-on effect on the economy, peace and stability.
However, those directly affected by Ebola are just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. During outbreaks, healthcare provisions for other diseases and routine services are often severely compromised, especially in places where the healthcare system is already poorly equipped and significantly underfunded.
This year alone, thousands in the DR Congo have died of measles, as vaccination programs have been scaled back to free up resources for the fight against Ebola.
Such large-scale health catastrophes leave lasting scars on a country and its people. They have the potential to reverse hard-won progress on social and economic development, leaving communities behind. These catastrophes are set to become even more common, owing to factors such as violent conflict, weak governance, antimicrobial resistance, climate change and mass migration.
As long as governments and the international community fail to invest in strengthening health systems, outbreaks will continue to impose huge costs on communities before being brought under control. Operating healthcare facilities without sources of safe water, toilets and hand-washing facilities are stark examples of just such a failure.
Fortunately, there is reason to hope that, at long last, a change for the better is imminent. In May, more than 160 years after the link between hygiene and disease prevention was established, country leaders at the World Health Assembly adopted a resolution focused on addressing the lack of water, sanitation and hygiene in healthcare facilities in lower and middle-income countries.
The growing threat of epidemics and related crises, including the spread of drug-resistant superbugs, seems to have finally shaken world leaders out of their torpor on developing-country healthcare.
This new commitment is about to be put to the test. The WHO’s declaration on the DR Congo’s Ebola outbreak was critical, because it should mobilize the international community to ramp up their contributions.
However, if the world is to prevent further health crises in East Africa, it cannot pursue yet more short-sighted solutions. Instead, it needs a comprehensive, forward-looking strategy that recognizes that a health center is not a health center without clean water.
Savio Carvalho is director of global campaigns at WaterAid.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and