Even the unseasonable downpour could not dampen the spirits of the executives and officials gathered on the Indonesian island of Batam to cut the ribbon on a new Pegatron factory. The men exchanged jokes as they took shelter under a white canopy and when company vice chairman Jason Cheng (程建中) pledged to hire hundreds of locals, the assembled audience erupted in applause.
The low-key ceremony last month to launch a manufacturing outpost marked a critical first step into Southeast Asia for one of Apple’s most important suppliers.
It also encapsulates a fundamental move of electronics production, set in motion by the escalating US-China trade dispute, that might hurt the Chinese economy while enriching Southeast Asia and beyond.
Illustration: Mountain People
“Pegatron, and many more to come, is an opportunity,” Edy Putra Irawady, head of a local agency charged with enticing capital, told the crowd. “Batam has prepared various incentives to chase the opportunity and attract more investment.”
Irawady is one of many making preparations for the most profound shift in global manufacturing since the advent of the made-in-China model in the 1980s: its potential dismantling.
Trump’s flip-flops on trade, including a backtracking just last week on threats to slap punishing tariffs on US$300 billion of Chinese goods, are spurring an exodus from China of manufacturers. Some recognize that US-Chinese tensions will not fade soon, while others are just tired of the uncertainty.
In one of the most dramatic responses since Trump first brandished full tariffs, HP laptop-maker Inventec declared plans to move its entire US-bound laptop operations from China to its home base of Taiwan within months.
“The trade war is very painful for us,” Inventec pesident Maurice Wu (巫永財) said.
Like Pegatron, the makers of the world’s electronics are increasingly rushing out of the way of Trump-administration tariffs on Chinese-made goods. Server motherboard makers for Google and Amazon.com are already shifting to Taiwan. Even Apple, whose gargantuan Chinese production machine hires more people than any other private employer, is testing the waters.
GoerTek, for one, is trying out production of AirPods in Vietnam, people familiar with the matter said.
A GoerTek representative declined to comment on the specifics of its Apple business, but said the company would gradually make several products in both China and Vietnam.
The US president’s campaign of tariffs and export restrictions against Chinese champions, such as Huawei Technologies, threatens to upend the production of the world’s electronics, from iPhones and laptops to 4K televisions.
The decades-old supply chain is starting to split in two: One beyond China’s borders that serves US concerns and another within the world’s most populous country that caters to local consumers.
It is something Foxconn’s billionaire founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), calls “G2,” or the emergence of two competing global standards created by China and the US.
Gou — who as Apple’s main production partner helped pioneer the made-in-China model — has volunteered to “help the US reshape a new supply chain.”
Young Liu (劉揚偉), Gou’s successor, told shareholders the company could make every US-bound iPhone outside of China if it had to.
While US-based companies seek alternatives beyond China, their counterparts in China likewise are “de-Americanizing” their supply chains, reducing their reliance on US core technology for fear they will suffer the same fate as Huawei. The company is now hunting for Asian and European component makers to reduce its dependence on US firms from Google to Micron.
This month, Huawei approved Taiwan-based Wi-Fi module maker RichWave Technology to supply parts that US wireless semiconductor company Skyworks used to provide.
Analysts, including Kevin Chen of Taipei-based President Capital Management, have said that Huawei is increasingly looking to Taiwan’s Win Semiconductors to manufacture radio frequency chips previously supplied by Skyworks and compatriot integrated circuits maker Qorvo.
“Both US and Chinese companies are diversifying their supply chains due to similar reasons — to mitigate geopolitical risks,” Taiwan Institute of Economic Research Macroeconomic Forecasting Center director Gordon Sun (孫明德) said.
Mere months ago, it seemed as if China had a virtual lock on the business of making the world’s electronics — an arrangement that benefited not just technology juggernauts from Dell Technologies to HP, but also ensured jobs for millions across the country and fostered the growth of a massive domestic manufacturing industry.
While there is little chance that China will fully cede its mantle as the world’s electronics workshop anytime soon, the outward-bound trend is accelerating. That is because the household names that built the technology industry’s global supply chain are not waiting to see how the conflict turns out.
Delta Electronics, which makes power and cooling components for clients like Microsoft and Huawei, is moving some production back to its home base of Taiwan and to Thailand. It is also taking the unusual step of building three to four plants in India, responding to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s “Make in India” program.
Modi’s efforts to drive foreign companies to source components locally is showing success. Foxconn is to start to churn out iPhones in the country this year after its print circuit board affiliate and Apple supplier Zhen Ding Technology Holding announced plans to invest there late last year.
Luxshare Precision Industry, another Apple supplier, is considering moving some production of cables and connectors to India as well, according to people familiar with the matter, with one saying Apple made the request to the Chinese company.
Calls to a number listed on the Luxshare Web site went unanswered and the company did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.
Chinese smartphone brands, including Huawei, Oppo and Xiaomi, are all making handsets in India.
It is not just the US-China tension that keeps supply chain executives up at night. Politically motivated trade protectionism might be spreading.
Japanese curbs on the export of vital chip and display-making materials to South Korea — the latest manifestation of lingering tensions stretching back to colonization by Tokyo and World War II — threaten to further splinter the industry.
If unresolved, that dispute might hinder efforts to sate the enormous appetites of Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, expediting a production migration from Japan.
Any shift would not happen overnight. While moving assembly operations is unlike relocating a chip fabrication facility — arguably the most expensive type of plant at US$10 billion or more to set up from scratch — the cost can run into millions of US dollars and entails a plethora of issues from licenses to new regulations and hiring. That is an additional burden that manufacturers with single-digit margins can ill afford.
“Our net profit margin stands at a mere 1.4 percent in the first quarter. The tariffs are 25 percent. We simply cannot help our customers absorb those,” Quanta Computer chairman Barry Lam (林百里) said in May when talking about potential production shift and tariff impact.
Despite Trump’s proclamations, the US would not get many of the jobs moving out of China. Taiwan and Southeast Asia are first in line to absorb any manufacturing exodus.
Vietnam has become the largest beneficiary of the trade dispute in the 12-month period beginning in the first quarter of last year, gaining 7.9 percent of GDP from trade diversion, Nomura said in a note on June 3.
Batam, once a poverty-stricken corner of the Indonesian archipelago, is on the cusp of a boom thanks to abundant cheap labor and quick access to the adjacent trading hub of Singapore.
Pegatron has poured US$40 million into its newest Indonesian plant, which would produce networking gear for the US market.
It is pledging to grow the workforce there from 40 people to as many as 1,800 eventually.
“We’re very determined to invest more,” Cheng said.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry