Baeck Ha-na works in accounting during the week. On weekends, she’s a YouTube star in South Korea, promoting the “live-alone life.”
Baeck, whose YouTube channel in English is called “Solo-darity,” is part of a growing and determined group of South Korean women rejecting marriage and motherhood.
Such decisions are intensifying demographic and economic challenges for the government as the country faces one of the world’s lowest birthrates and a shortfall in pension funding that is getting harder to close with fewer workers joining the labor force.
Illustration: Lance Liu
“Society made me feel like a failure for being in my 30s and not yet a wife or a mother,” Baeck said. “Instead of belonging to someone, I now have a more ambitious future for myself.”
Baeck and her YouTube cohost maintain that the government’s current approach infuriates many women. They argue that the latest efforts to boost birthrates are “abusive” and “frustrating” because they fail to address the lack of legal avenues to ensure career development for mothers or alleviating financial burdens in raising children.
FEWER BABIES
When it comes to its birthrate, South Korea has ranked at the bottom of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries in the Asia-Pacific region since 2016, with that rate going even lower this year.
According to data compiled by the World Bank, South Korea and Puerto Rico tied for the lowest overall rates as of 2017: seven children per 1,000 people, followed by Japan and Hong Kong.
Data from South Korea’s national statistics agency in April showed that the number of births dropped even further as of February, a 7 percent decline from last year. This year, the number of those dying is expected to outpace the number of those being born, the agency said in a report.
A separate report from the agency said that fewer women believe marriage is a must. In 2010, 64.7 percent of women in South Korea answered that marriage is required for women, while 48.1 percent gave the same response in 2018.
GOVERNMENT MATCHMAKING
South Korea’s government is reacting by offering incentives to encourage marriage and especially parenthood. In Sejong, a city designated to be South Korea’s new administrative capital, about 30 single men and women attended its latest event last month. The government’s goal was to encourage working single men and women to take part in “recreational activities and table talks.”
In Gangnam, the Seocho District office held a similar event last year with 50 participants, 14 of whom got matched, the organizer said, adding they plan to hold another session this year.
In South Chungcheong Province, the government has asked single women to submit an application that includes their height, weight and employment, as well as a recent photo and relationship history.
In December 2017, South Korean President Moon Jae-in launched a committee to tackle the country’s low birthrate — the Presidential Committee on Aging Society and Population Policy.
“We are now at the last golden time to fix a serious population problem,” Moon said in a speech during the committee launch. “We must now focus on how marrying, giving birth doesn’t limit the lives of women.”
ECONOMIC FALLOUT
The nation’s latest report on population cited a looming threat for South Korea’s labor force. From 2017 to 2027, the number of people within the productive age range is expected to fall by 2.5 million, while the older population will increase by 4.5 million.
An estimated 37.6 million people were measured to be in the potential work force in 2017. By 2067, that number is anticipated to drop by more than half to 17.8 million people, the report said.
The demographic changes are already affecting some businesses.
More than 20 percent of all wedding halls in Seoul have closed, including two of the largest venues in wealthier neighborhoods of Gangnam: Suaviss Wedding Hall and JS Gangnam Wedding Culture Center, a city report said.
The Seoul Education Office announced earlier this year that it expects to close three elementary and middle schools by February next year, while another middle school is closing and combining its campus with an elementary school that is also facing a student shortage.
In Busan, the number of elementary students registered for schools dropped by 26 percent over the past nine years from 199,407 students in 2010 to 147,340 students as of March. The number of middle-school students dropped by 43 percent, while high-school students dropped by 40 percent.
RIDING SOLO
Baeck said that government policies “to force a woman into marriage and childbearing represent a deeply ingrained perception of a woman in our society as an object, not an individual.”
She even refuses to be called mi-hon, or “not yet married,” a common South Korean term for a single woman. Baeck instead prefers bi-hon, which means “to not marry, to not have children.”
Baeck is a member of EMIF, or “Elite without Marriage, I am going Forward,” a network created for women to host discussions, attend film screenings and hold networking events. At a recent evening meeting of EMIF in western Seoul, nine members moved desks to form a circle to discuss being a bi-hon, and the policies created to tackle South Korea’s low birthrate.
“The government’s biggest problem is that they aren’t listening to the women — the actual subjects that have to bear the children and have to raise the children,” said Kang Han-byul, the group’s cofounder. “They try to sell this idea that a family is beautiful, having children is beautiful, when there’s many unspoken things that actually happen to the woman physically, mentally — which is why these policies will never win us over.”
Others also reject long-held roles for women in South Korea, including motherhood.
“This traditional role enforced on us from a boys-only soccer field at school to a boys club in a company office already makes us second-class citizens, and I don’t want to be used as a tool simply for baby-making,” said Jung Se-young, a cohost on Baeck’s YouTube channel.
TRENDING ON TWITTER
The reaction to what the women call South Korea’s government’s “tone-deaf” policies have prompted a hashtag on Twitter as well, with women sharing their stories about living a life not focused on marriage and having babies.
“People used to say I can’t do anything without a father in the house,” an anonymous account dedicated to sharing her bi-hon life said on Twitter. “I bought a silicone gun on my own and can mend my own windows to block the rain from leaking in. Why did I ever doubt myself before?”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with