The Chinese Taipei Skating Union (CTSU) is skating on thin ice as the government and the public demand answers about who knew what and when about a shift in the venue for this year’s inaugural Asian Open Figure Skating Classic from Taipei to China.
The skating world should also be asking tough questions about the confusion, as cracks appear in various stories faster than water can freeze.
Many people in Taiwan were shocked when the CTSU on Tuesday announced that the International Skating Union (ISU) had informed it that the plan to hold the competition in Taipei in October had been changed, and that the competition would instead be hosted by the Hong Kong Skating Union (HKSU) in Dongguan, China.
It said it had immediately contacted the ISU to ask why and that it was preparing to appeal the decision.
However, on Wednesday CTSU officials said that it suggested to the ISU in May that the venue could be changed, but did not say it was forfeiting its right to host the competition.
CTSU secretary-general Eddy Wu (吳奕德) told a news conference that the CTSU and the HKSU had applied in February to host the Classic and on March 27 Taipei had been listed as one of the venues for this year’s Challenger Series.
The ISU established its Challenger Series, a group of senior-level events, in the 2014-2015 season to give more skaters a chance to compete at the international senior level and earn world standing points. The events are required to include at least three disciplines and to take place annually between Aug. 1 and Dec. 15.
While the ISU on May 20 said that Taipei would be hosting the new event, Wu blamed “invisible international pressure” for causing the ISU to change its mind, saying that some “friendly” ISU members had told the CTSU that others had been conspiring to boycott the Taipei event, which could lead to the number of participating nations falling below what would be needed for skaters to qualify for world standing points.
He said the CTSU had told the ISU that it hoped the world body would continue to back Taipei’s hosting of the event, but that “maybe changing the venue could be a possible option.”
Meanwhile, the HKSU on May 29 announced that it would be hosting this year’s Asian Open Figure Skating Trophy competition — an event usually held in early August that Taiwan hosted in 2007, 2012 and 2014 — in Dongguan from Aug. 5 to 9 with men’s, ladies’, pairs and ice dance events.
However, on June 21, the HKSU announced that “due to recent social issues happening in Hong Kong” the Asian Open Figure Skating Trophy event had to be postponed and rescheduled — a notice that the CTSU also posted on its Web site.
Dongguan is about 90km from Hong Kong and presumably a large number of the competitors would have been flying into Hong Kong and then heading into mainland China.
The CTSU said four days later that the ISU asked it to hand the rights to the Classic to the HKSU, but while Wu said the CTSU told the ISU it agreed to the arrangement, it also said it would wait “for a final decision from the ISU council.”
On Monday, the ISU announced that the Asian Open Figure Skating Trophy competition would be held in Dongguan from Oct. 30 to Nov. 3 and would replace the Asian Open Figure Skating Classic.
So it is beginning to look like Taipei losing the new Classic event was not so much “international pressure” — of course interpreted to mean pressure from Beijing — as much as an attempt by the ISU to help the HKSU and skaters and teams that had already made plans to go to Dongguan early next month.
Who knows? There are many questions for which Taiwanese, as well as skaters from Asia and elsewhere, have yet to receive satisfactory answers.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry