Pro-unification opposites
Several Taiwanese stock market analysts at the Shanghai-based Thousand & Billion Education and Trading Co — New Party presidential candidate Yang Shih-kuang’s (楊世光) employer — have been arrested on fraud charges.
Yang reportedly released a statement through the party, attributing the incident to the delay of the legislative approval of the Cross-strait Service Trade Agreement by the Sunflower movement protests in 2014.
Since the agreement was not approved, he said there might be confusion over the operational scope of Taiwanese businesses in the financial service sector and over the recognition of their professional licenses. He urged the Mainland Affairs Council to contact Beijing through its channels as soon as possible and to provide legal assistance to the analysts.
However, the council said that according to the early harvest list of the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, which took effect in 2010, the Chinese government should have allowed Taiwan’s securities practitioners to acquire the qualifications required to practice in China long ago.
It is obviously Beijing that is at fault, but Yang does not dare to criticize Beijing.
This incident shows that New Party members actually have little confidence in the Chinese judiciary. Why else would advocates of cross-strait unification turn to the council for help? If China really is as great as they claim, why do they not just face the Chinese judicial system?
The arrests of Chinese human rights lawyers, the disappearances of Hong Kong booksellers, the detention of 2010 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波) — which led to his death — and the imprisonment of Taiwanese activist Lee Ming-che (李明哲) for posting online critiques show how terrible Beijing’s authoritarian rule is.
Surely the pro-unification camp must feel a lack of conviction next time they clamor so loudly for unification.
How are they going to refute the argument that without democracy and freedom, there is no chance to survive?
Pan Kuan
New Taipei City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.