The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) held its National Policy Vision on Television in Taichung on June 29, its second event to showcase the party’s presidential primary contenders. The topics included youth, society, culture and education.
One of the candidates, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), betrayed his lack of political experience by voicing some wild, unfunded policy pledges.
Gou started off talking about fiscal policy, claiming that the nation is about to go bankrupt. He followed this by promising to provide free kindergartens for all children up to the age of six, explaining that he would fund this by creating a new revenue stream using “the nation’s big data resources.”
Former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) then made Gou look rather foolish by pointing out that a government’s balance sheet is different from a company’s.
The nation’s assets far outstrip its liabilities, and its finances are in far better shape than many comparable countries, Chu said.
There are only two explanations as to why an experienced entrepreneur like Gou would conflate the balance sheet of a nation with that of a company. Either he does not know what a balance sheet is or he tried to deceive the public for some particular purpose.
This lack of understanding is confirmed when examining Gou’s policy pledge of state-funded kindergartens.
There are about 1.4 million children aged one to six in Taiwan. If all of these children are to be looked after by the state, what does this mean in practical terms?
For the sake of argument, the government could give each family NT$20,000 (US$641) a month for each eligible child, which would cost it NT$336 billion a year.
Since the central government’s annual budget stands at NT$2 trillion and local government budgets total NT$1 trillion, Gou’s idea would increase government expenditure by more than 10 percent.
Does Gou really not see how difficult that would be? It is a simple calculation, but a closer look is enough to know who is speaking without thinking.
Gou says that the funding for childcare would come from wealth created using the nation’s big data resources, which is frightening. For example, Taiwanese big data that international businesses are interested in is the National Health Insurance data, which includes all information about the health of Taiwanese — and foreigners living or studying here — a highly sensitive privacy issue.
This is why every past president has placed severe restrictions on the data and only allowed a small number of academic studies to gain access to part of it.
Is Gou perhaps thinking about emulating the Chinese government’s big data exchange — where businesses can trade data — and selling Taiwanese’s data to private businesses?
Even leaving aside the question of how sufficient funding could be created from such data, Gou would have to explain how the data would be used, how privacy would be protected and how he would build public trust in such an institution.
If he cannot provide such complementary measures, waving big data around is just another political ruse.
When Gou — an outstanding entrepreneur — enters a presidential election, it is both new and refreshing, and it creates expectations. However, his status also means that no one has ever examined his personal beliefs before, and we have only heard bits and pieces of what he really thinks and wants.
Gou has participated in two KMT policy debates, but he still cannot provide a clear, in-depth account of his childcare policy.
He has also been unable to dispel even the most fundamental doubts, not to mention transforming it into a policy highlight. There is not enough time for Gou to do all the reading up he should do.
Wei Shui-hsiu is a university professor.
Translated by Edward Jones and Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under