The gulf between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership and a majority of Hong Kongers has grown even wider over the past few months, as the effort by the territory’s government to push through an extradition bill repeatedly drew hundreds of thousands of people to protests last month and led to the storming of the Legislative Council building on Monday evening.
Slamming British criticism of Beijing’s rule, Chinese Ambassador to the UK Liu Xiaoming (劉曉明) on Wednesday told reporters that under British rule there was “no freedom, democracy, whatever” in Hong Kong and the “people had no right to elect officials [and] no right to demonstrate.”
It is a pity that Liu did not take advantage of his time at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, where he earned a master’s degree in international studies, to learn more about Hong Kong.
As shocking as the demonstrations have been — or the “Umbrella movement” of 2014 — for people outside Hong Kong, they pale in comparison to the 1967 riots in the territory.
During that unrest, which began in May with protests over the sackings of some employees at an artificial flower factory and lasted through December, hundreds of bombs went off, 51 people were killed, hundreds were injured, about 5,000 were arrested and property damage ran into the millions of US dollars.
Influenced by the Cultural Revolution under way in China and widespread poverty in Hong Kong, huge demonstrations were held against British rule and widespread strikes were called, with Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book brandished by protesters while loudspeakers on the roof of the Bank of China building aired Chinese propaganda.
However, as the unrest turned more deadly, public support for the protests began to fade.
Many of the territory’s academics, journalists and politicians have said that a sense of Hong Kong identity was forged during the 1967 unrest, an identity that was reinforced in 1989 by the protests against the Tiananmen Square Massacre and then again by the “Umbrella movement.”
Academic and Alliance for True Democracy convener Joseph Cheng (鄭宇碩) last year told the South China Morning Post that “the riots had a great effect on the relationship between the people and the government,” as the colonial administration realized the importance of listening to people, and initiated social reforms and the opening of district council offices.
Unfortunately, that is a lesson that Beijing’s leadership has ignored since the handover.
As former Hong Kong chief secretary Anson Chan (陳方安生) told the Washington Post last month: “Beijing has misinterpreted Hong Kong’s culture, psyche and feelings. If only Beijing would understand what makes Hong Kong tick, what are the values we hold dear, then they can use that energy to benefit both China and Hong Kong.”
Liu’s comments show just how ill-informed he and Beijing are: While the first direct elections for the Hong Kong Legislative Council were not until 1991, documents released by the UK National Archives in 2014 showed that colonial governors in the 1950s repeatedly tried to introduce elections, but Britain backed down in the face of threats by Beijing to invade the territory if London changed the “status quo.”
The 1967 protests show that Hong Kongers were able to demonstrate, while Liu’s remark about the lack of “independent judicial power” is ludicrous, given that it is China’s kangaroo court system and lack of legal rights that have inspired such resistance to the plan to change Hong Kong’s laws to allow extradition to China.
The “patriotic education” that the CCP and pro-Beijing politicians in the territory have called for is unlikely to change Hong Kongers’ view of China. It is Beijing’s leaders who need to be better educated.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under