A bill submitted last week to the US Congress would call on US intelligence agencies to report on efforts to aid Taiwan as it battles Chinese influence in next year’s presidential election. While it remains to be seen whether the bill would boost US provision of intelligence and technical know-how to Taiwan or simply furnish a report after the fact, it is certainly a welcome piece of legislation in an area that seems to have stumped politicians.
For all their bluster about the threat of foreign meddling and false news reports, lawmakers have been slow to tackle the issue. Efforts discussed in the legislative chamber have largely been confined to beefing up fines against media outlets that disseminate false information, finding and punishing individuals who disseminate false news, and keeping foreign money out of political donations and ads.
The first method takes a narrow view of false or misleading information reported by traditional news media, such as TV and radio. While necessary to address, it fails to tackle the equally sinister effects of information shared online.
Laws that directly address the Internet target individuals who create or share such news, but this tactic not only consumes time and resources, it is often ineffective, as IP addresses are easily obscured.
Taiwanese lawmakers are not the only ones out of their depth on this issue. Governments have generally adopted one of two strategies: punish the platforms or strengthen the government.
Many European states have favored the former, with Germany last year passing an ambitious law that would require platforms to remove banned content within 24 hours or face a fine of up to 50 million euros (US$56.42 million).
While this type of “you break it, you fix it” policy might seem attractive, it comes with its own set of unintended consequences. Faced with such steep penalties, platforms will simply remove all flagged content. This strategy has already been exploited by actors who wish to silence others. Indeed, after only two months, Germany acknowledged that too much data had been incorrectly deleted and began drafting an amendment to address the issue.
In addition, requiring companies to police their own content would entrench the major players, once and for all wiping out any chance of competition — what start-up would be able to create a mandatory review division on the same level as those set up by Facebook and Twitter?
The second strategy is clearly rife with issues, to which media clampdowns in nations such as Malaysia and Russia can attest.
However, the legislature is not the only place such issues are being discussed. Taiwan is actually at the forefront of some exciting initiatives, even if they are not as flashy as a 50 million euro fine.
Most interesting among them is a project initiated by the civic technology collective g0v called Cofacts for “collaborative fact-checking.” The group collaborated with the Line messaging app to install a Cofacts bot that people can add as a friend. If someone is unsure of a claim someone sent them, they can simply forward the message to the bot. If the same thing was flagged by two or more people, it is sent to a board where editors can fact-check the claim and provide citations. After a reply is verified, any user who submits a fact-checking request for the same claim will automatically receive the verified response.
“People inoculate against that potentially weaponizable misinformation, so that it doesn’t actually turn into disinformation... It adds to the conversation without censoring anything away,” Minister Without Portfolio Audrey Tang (唐鳳) said while touting the initiative on April 24 at George Washington University.
The Web tangles issues of free speech, human rights and communication into a jumble unprecedented in human history. As one thread is straightened, the others constrict into a tighter knot. As politicians attempt to wade into the mess, they should be working with their civic and private partners to create solutions that address the root of the problem, instead of only punishing after the fact.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs