The New Party on Tuesday nominated Youth Corps director Yang Shih-kuang (楊世光) to be its presidential candidate, who then gave a rather confusing news conference to lay out his vision for Taiwan.
No surprise, he is strongly pro-unification. He also criticized President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) record, but then struggled to link those two themes based on the fact that Tsai is not a man.
Although New Party Chairman Yok Mu-ming (郁慕明) said that the party fielding its own candidate should not be seen as a break with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), or trying to upset the pan-blue camp’s apple cart, there was certainly a contrived attempt to differentiate potential and confirmed rivals as either “man” or “woman,” and to equate their characteristics with pro-unification or pro-independence stances respectively.
Thus, according to Yang, Tsai is definitely a woman, Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) is not and the jury is out on Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘), who “might be a man,” and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who is “likely not a woman.”
Once Yang had cleared up the “political gender” question, he set about establishing the rationale for his objection to Tsai: Not only is she a woman, but she is single.
We know how politically dangerous single women are because Yok has told us before.
In a January 2016 interview with China Review News, Yok said: “What is different between Tsai and [former president] Chen [Shui-bian (陳水扁)] is that she is single. Single people do things more ruthlessly because they have less to care about compared with those who have children… One day she might go amok; she might ally with the US and Japan, and start a war against China.”
Despite the preposterousness of this contention, Yang extrapolated on it. His argument seems to be that an unmarried and childless Tsai is not as invested in the nation’s future the way that people who have children are, and therefore she is “unqualified.”
This is blatantly misogynistic. Nobody would think of questioning whether a single, childless male politician is “qualified” to lead the nation or create government policy on promoting a higher fertility rate, for example.
One can only imagine that Yok and Yang’s intention was to generate publicity for their party, its candidate and its policies. To a certain extent, they succeeded. Yet they also handed Tsai a political gift.
The idea is so ridiculous and offensive that Tsai had no need to respond, but she did, the same day, on Facebook.
Tsai wrote of how she had been subjected to this kind of ad hominem attack before, and it was exactly the kind of obstacle many Taiwanese women have to face on a regular basis.
She was able to forward her unique credentials to speak on behalf of half the nation, and then she laid out examples of what her administration had done for the next generation and those trying to start a family: increasing the minimum wage, reducing taxes for families with infants, increasing subsidies for kindergarten education, building more social housing and promoting long-term care for the elderly.
She also called out Yok and Yang for the misogyny behind their statements.
This was all accompanied with a photograph of a smiling Tsai holding a small child and chatting with mothers. Emblazoned across the image was the slogan “Working hard for Taiwan’s next generation.”
Ironically, all Yang managed to do with his news conference was to amply demonstrate that he and the New Party are unqualified to lead the nation into the future.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under