A team of researchers, statisticians and geographers are to gather on Friday next week at University College London to tackle an issue of increasing concern for doctors and health experts. They will investigate why many UK citizens are now living shorter, less-healthy lives compared with the recent past.
The emergence of faltering life expectancy in Britain has caused particular alarm because it reverses a trend that has continued, almost unbroken, for close to 100 years. Over this period, lives have lengthened continuously, blessing more and more British people with the gift of old age.
However, now that increase has come to a halt, statisticians have discovered. Indeed, among many sections of the UK population, declines have set in.
Illustration: Mountain People
Hence the meeting, organized by the British Society for Population Studies so delegates can use data — to be released by the British Office for National Statistics — to update their life expectancy projections.
“It is a perfect storm,” said Danny Dorling, a professor of social geography at Oxford University, who has organized the London meeting.
“Our faltering life expectancy rates show we have now got the worst trend in health anywhere in western Europe since the second world war. To achieve that, we must have made a lot of bad decisions,” he said.
Statisticians first noticed in 2013 that rises in life expectancy in the UK had begun to slow down. Gradually, the graph — which been rising for decades — flattened out until, a few years ago, it started to decline for increasing numbers of people.
The elderly, the poor and the newborn were worst affected. For example, life expectancies for those over 65 have dropped by more than six months.
The trend now causes considerable concern among doctors, who view life expectancy figures as barometers of the health of Britain. From this perspective, the nation is sickening and a host of different factors have been put forward as explanations.
One frequently made claim is that humans have simply reached the peak of longevity.
“Life expectancy cannot be expected to increase forever,” Conservative lawmaker Robert Courts told the British House of Commons recently.
However, many statisticians point out that life expectancy has continued to rise — well above UK levels — in many other places, including Hong Kong, China, Japan and Scandinavia.
Other factors must be involved, they say.
For its part, the UK Department of Health initially claimed that flu epidemics, triggered by harsh winters, were killing the weak and elderly, raising mortality rates and reducing life expectancies.
However, this idea is dismissed by Lucinda Hiam, an honorary research fellow at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
“I was working as a GP [general practitioner] during this time and didn’t notice a dramatic increase in flu among patients coming into my practice,” she said.
In fact, it has been shown that five of the seven winters from 2011 to 2017 had above-average temperatures, making them unlikely triggers of flu epidemics.
Nevertheless, the department persisted with the idea for some time.
“When my colleagues and I first questioned the strength of impact that flu was having in increasing deaths and suggested the role of the cuts should be explored, we were dismissed by health officials, but since then the evidence of flu being solely responsible has largely evaporated,” Hiam said.
Instead, Dorling, Hiam and many other epidemiologists argue that life expectancy started to decline in Britain as a direct result of the austerity measures imposed by the Conservative-led government in 2010. These cutbacks — which removed more than £30 billion (US$38.1 billion at the current exchange rate) from welfare payments, housing subsidies and social services over the past eight years — were some of the most severe made by any nation after the 2008 financial crisis.
Once imposed, they triggered dramatic reductions in funding for social care, meals on wheels, rural bus services, UK National Health Service spending, numbers of health visitors and many other services. These in turn contributed to increased numbers of early deaths of vulnerable people, it is argued.
“Life expectancies started to stall just after the austerity cuts were introduced,” Hiam said. “That alone does not prove the latter was the trigger for the former. However, no other plausible suggestion has since survived scrutiny, so it is hard not to conclude austerity cuts are involved.”
In the case of care for the elderly, the link looks especially persuasive.
“Funding for social care for the elderly had already been at breaking point for decades and recent austerity cuts only compounded the crisis,” UK senior health and care policy manager Tom Gentry said.
Previously, the only individuals who had contact with many lonely, isolated old people were social and community care workers. Then came the cuts, which led to a dramatic reduction in this last line in defense of the elderly.
“Today, there is often no one who is talking to those elderly folk or spotting when they have stopped eating or noticed that are not moving around or are having balance problems. Then they fall over, lie there for days before being found and are then readmitted to hospital where they have to be given more serious interventions than would otherwise have been the case. Inevitably that will mean shortened lives,” Gentry said.
Earlier this year, the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries — a chartered, regulatory body in the UK — said it now expects men aged 65 to die at 86.9 years, down from its previous estimate of 87.4 years, while women who reach 65 are likely to die at 89.2 years, down from 89.7 years.
In other words, the life expectancy of people entering pension age has been cut by six months.
This has implications not just for the UK’s health services, but for its pensions industry.
“The recent lowering of improvements in life expectancies has already had consequences,” said Cobus Daneel, who is with the institute’s Continuous Mortality Investigation. “Insurance companies have been releasing money because it is realized they may not have to pay out as much to pay future pensions as previously expected.”
“Of course, life expectancies still have room to get better in the future,” Daneel said.
At the same time, the government has plans to put up the state pension age to 68 and has floated the idea of increasing it to 70. Now it might be forced to backtrack as increases in life expectancies stall.
“The increase to age 68 is only scheduled to come in between 2037 and 2039 and I would expect there will now have to be a further review before they are implemented,” Daneel said.
Last week, former British secretary of health Jeremy Hunt admitted that some cuts in social care funding imposed by the Conservative government “did go too far.”
However, the Department of Health continues to reject any link between those cuts and drops in life expectancies.
“We are taking action to help people live longer and healthier lives,” a department spokesman said. “Cancer survival is at a record high, while smoking rates and teenage pregnancies are at an all-time low.”
Nevertheless, the connection between austerity and dwindling life expectancy is hard to shake off, said David Walsh, of the Glasgow Centre for Population Health.
The Scottish city once had some of the worst life expectancy rates in the Western world — for example, in the central area of Calton, a place blighted by poor housing, illness, high smoking rates and violence.
Inhabitants suffered high death rates linked to drug and alcohol abuse and suicides. As a result, at the beginning of the 21st century, the male life expectancy in Calton at birth was 54, one of the worst figures in the UK.
Glasgow subsequently made major efforts to improve death rates in Calton, but is now watching life expectancies slide back toward their old levels.
“I think it is pretty clear that austerity is to blame,” Walsh said. “We have taken away these people’s safety nets.”
The grim future facing these young adults was summed up by Michael Marmot, a professor of epidemiology at University College London.
“If you were to go to a young man growing up in Calton who is doing drugs and alcohol and smoking and is unemployed and is unemployable, and say to him: ‘Look, you really shouldn’t smoke.’ Well, you wouldn’t get far with him and, in any case, he might be quite rational for not making long-term plans because he does not have a long-term future,” Marmot said.
On top of the health impacts on the elderly and the deprived, there has also been a worrying change in infant mortality rates — as was acknowledged last week by the Office for National Statistics.
It reported that in 2017, there were 3.9 deaths per 1,000 live births in the UK. In 2016, there were 3.8.
“Infant mortality had been reducing since the 1980s and reached an all-time low in 2014, but since then the rate has increased every year,” said Vasita Patel, a senior research officer at the office. “The one in 2017 is significantly higher than the one in 2014.”
To explain this alarming increase in infant mortality, Dorling blamed a host of factors: “Fewer midwives, an overstrained ambulance service, general deterioration of hospitals, greater poverty among pregnant women and cuts that mean there are fewer health visitors for patients in need — all these factors are involved.”
The crucial point is that health statistics show something fundamental about how well a society is doing, Marmot said.
“When you see significant differences in life expectancy rates, that is telling us something particularly important about how well society is distributing its benefits,” he said.
According to Marmot, a former president of the World Medical Association, a person with a university degree in Britain has a longer life expectancy than a school leaver with A-levels, who in turn will do better than someone who did not sit A-levels.
“The higher your income, the longer you live,” he said. “Similarly, the higher the status of your occupation, the longer your life expectancy.”
Equally, the lower the step on the socioeconomic ladder that a person stands on, the more dependent they are likely to be on help or support from local authorities. As a result, these individuals are disproportionately affected when cuts are made to services.
“Two years ago, I went out of my way not to blame austerity measures for faltering life expectancy rates,” Marmot said. “Now I am much closer to blaming them for the ills we are witnessing.”
While Marmot remains cautious, Dorling and Hiam are more certain of a causal link between austerity cuts and lowering life expectancy rates.
However, all agree on one issue: There is an urgent need for a full-scale inquiry into the issue, a move that is also supported by Martin McKee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
“Health authorities cannot continue to dismiss the possibility of a link between cuts and lowered life expectancies. We need to find precise answers and we need them urgently. The only way to do that is to set up a proper public inquiry — as a matter of urgency,” McKee said.
Of course, in coming years, mortality rates might halt their decline and begin to show renewed growth, but to rejoice at these would be a mistake, Dorling said.
“Life expectancy in the UK is a long way from what it should be for a country as rich as ours. The argument should not be about weeks of life lost or regained, but how many years are being lost to life expectancies because we chose not to do what a normal European country would do and that is to invest properly in social care,” he said.
The real fear is that Britain is falling into a pattern that has emerged in the US, where taxes — and social care budgets — are low and where much of the healthcare system is privately run.
In the US, life expectancy started falling significantly years ago. Causes of soaring mortality rates there include spiraling rates of drug overdose deaths and suicides. However, care of the elderly and the very young is also under stress in many states.
“I am worried that we are heading along the same route as the US,” Marmot said. “We shouldn’t be. We should be investing significantly in health and social care like the rest of Europe. Its social policies are better for health and long life than American social policies.”
Robin McKie is the science and environment editor for the Observer.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry