The universe is vast. In it, our solar system is but a dot in our galaxy and our galaxy is but a dot among the many, many galaxies. Scientists speculate that there are more than 100 billion of them, but even if that figure were to be totally low-balled into just 1 billion galaxies, it would still boggle the mind.
In April, astronomers achieved a new milestone when they captured the first image of a black hole. That black hole was in Messier 87 (M87), a giant galaxy more than 54 million light years from Earth. It is larger than the sun in our solar system. Such is the vastness out there and such is our reach.
This macro-level perspective constantly challenges the micro perspectives found on Earth and raises innumerable questions. How does this vastness relate to Taiwan, with its 23 million people? How does this macro level perspective highlight the need for a new global paradigm among nations, Taiwan included?
Humans have always looked at the stars, but it was only after the achievements of the 1960s that this helped affect the paradigm shift to a global village, a phrase coined by Marshall McLuhan.
In 1961, Yuri Gargarin became the first man in space to orbit the Earth. In 1969, Apollo 11 landed two men on the moon. These accomplishments framed the significant decade of Earthlings going into space and, along with other advances in communications and technology, solidified McLuhan’s “global village.”
Half a century later, with the latest achievements in exploring the enormity of the universe, humankind is being pushed again to adapt, this time from a global village to a global home paradigm.
What does that mean?
In the vastness of the universe, our “blue marble” has become a minute home and this directs us to begin to refocus on what it means to belong more to the family of man on Earth and not just to the family of any one of the imagined communities of a particular nation, culture or religion.
However, where is the leadership in this? Three of the biggest nations — China, Russia and the US — which should be leading the way in developing a global consciousness, are not.
Despite their size, or perhaps because of it, these three have become part of the problem. Each seeks to recapture a mythical past greatness, and expand its borders and influence. Instead of looking to the future of the planet, they compete. And in their competition they remain mired in a zero-sum game.
It is the mid-sized nations that have taken the lead in planet consciousness. Taiwan’s population it is larger than 70 percent of the nations in the UN and in terms of GDP it is better than 80 percent. Yet it is not in the world body.
In a global home paradigm, all nations, big and small, would have to work together as a family. None could be excluded. In families, members do not play zero-sum games. The development of a global home consciousness and perspective affects everything — environment, economics and more; and it includes all nations.
National size creates problems. The US, China and Russia have no sense of the noblesse oblige that their size should bring with it. They fail their own citizens and feed their national oligarchs as they try to expand their influence and seek past glory.
The US will never regain its post-World War II luxury; China will not regain its storied Middle Kingdom glory with tributary states; and Russia, even with fake socialism, will not resurrect its empire of czars.
However, each — like an amoeba — tries to absorb all in its path with a “me first” attitude, while shunning transparency.
Size does create problems and men are fallible. The larger the nation, the greater the chances of the Peter Principle [a concept developed by educator Laurence Peter that says people in a hierarchy tend to rise to their level of incompetence] coming into effect, as well as a fostered and promoted cult of leaders.
It is the mid-sized nations that will lead the way. They have a sanity of give and take, and can think in terms of the whole. They do not need to dominate world space and they are not embarrassed if they do not.
However, among these mid-sized nations, Taiwan, which is strategic, does not have a place at the table.
Taiwan has and knows the value of a hard-won democracy. It leads the way in Asia in granting same-sex marriage rights; it has a superb universal healthcare; and it ranks among all nations in the top percentiles of GDP. It puts satellites in space. Yet it is not at the table.
This is not just Taiwan’s problem; it is symptomatic of the problem that a changing world must face if a true global and environmental consciousness is to develop to match humankind’s sense of place in the universe.
Russia and the US, in their own ways, hinder world advancement. In Taiwan’s case, the chief enemy of its democracy and freedom is China.
Yes, that is the same China that brought the world the Tiananmen Square Massacre, the SARS epidemic, the ruination of Tibetan culture, Uighur concentration camps, the obstruction of Taiwan from being part of the WHO and its World Health Assembly, swine fever and broken promises of democracy for Hong Kong to name a few.
Instead of solving its internal problems, China focuses on expanding its territory by claiming Taiwan.
This illustrates why Taiwan remains an outlier, midsized nation; it is needed and full of potential, but kept from making its full contribution to developing the goal of a global home consciousness.
Many nations exist with innumerable internal problems that keep them from participating in global consciousness, but Taiwan’s case is different. It is not a matter of Taiwan not being up to snuff; instead, it is that of a key player being held back. If the exclusion of Taiwan is what happens in the greenwood of new consciousness, what will happen in the dry?
More people are becoming aware of the growing world problems that spread and cross borders with impunity, such as crime, disease, global warming, pollution and human trafficking. In solving them, the world will need all contributors.
Therefore, Taiwan should not be hidden in the attic of the global home. It is a standout, mid-sized nation and its exclusion is symptomatic of the cancer that continually eats at the ineffective abilities of the UN.
If the other nations cannot solve the Taiwan problem, they will never foster sustainable development and in turn never face the challenges of a growing consciousness of our galaxy and the expanding universe.
Jerome Keating is a writer based in Taipei.
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
Burger King Taiwan on Wednesday last week posted an update on Facebook advertising a new “Wuhan pneumonia” (武漢肺炎) home delivery meal, catering to customers hankering for a Whopper, but who wished to avoid visiting one of its outlets. “Wuhan pneumonia” is the term commonly used in Taiwan to describe COVID-19. Beijing has been waging an extensive propaganda campaign against the use of the words “Wuhan” or “China” in reference to the novel coronavirus, calling it racist and discriminatory. Meanwhile, Chinese officials have claimed that the coronavirus might have originated in the US. The intention is obvious: to distract attention from the Chinese Communist