Last week’s 2 million-strong demonstrations in Hong Kong shook the world and exceeded even the 2 million who supported the student-led demonstrations in China in 1989.
In 1989, the demonstrators in Hong Kong expressed their support for the Chinese democracy movement; this time they are fighting to protect their own rights.
Under British discretionary rule at the time, the Hong Kong government did not oppose the demonstrations, but this time, organizations, businesses and even families have been infiltrated by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), in addition to the difficulties created by the government for the huge, suppressed demonstrations.
The significance of this cannot be understated.
Nevertheless, Western countries have done little to support the protesters, as they do not understand the issue well enough. In practice, the Western world did not understand the dangers of the 1997 Hong Kong handover either, because it was part of an appeasement policy and seen as perfectly natural.
However, the Hong Kong handover was a major shot in the arm for China.
First, the CCP used violence to grab power. Its rule has never been lawful and has always lacked legitimacy, especially after the great famine of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution killed as many as 80 million people. That is the reason China used reform, opening up and economic development to build legitimacy. That legitimacy was once again destroyed by the Tiananmen Square Massacre, although the return of Hong Kong allowed Beijing to restore legitimacy with the help of nationalism, especially after the economy took off after China joined the WTO.
Second, the CCP is using Hong Kong’s capital markets to obtain great benefits and expand its political, economic and military influence. Before taking over Hong Kong, the CCP worried that the territory would stop laying its golden eggs and become a burden, which was the background to the party’s repeated calls for investors to stop worrying.
Following the calm handover, Hong Kong’s golden eggs belonged to China. The most obvious example was the Hong Kong stock market, which largely became dominated by Chinese-invested stocks, especially after a Chinese, Charles Li (李小加), became chief executive officer of Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.
Disregarding Hong Kong’s military position in the South China Sea, after understanding its political and economic importance to China, the US should find ways to leverage the territory in the US-China trade war.
Looking at the trade war simply as a fight over domination is superficial. The US’ previous appeasement of China was based on the mistaken view that reform and opening up would put China on the road to democracy rather than becoming dependent on the US. The trade war is also an attempt by the US to force structural reform in China.
The problem is that China refuses to reform and instead engages in military expansionism, forcing the US to fall back on its high tech and military strength to prevent it.
The only reason that the US’ good intentions, especially toward the welfare of Chinese, have been painted by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) as an attempt to discredit him is that he wants to hold on to his position as dictator.
During reform and opening up in the 1980s, China was learning from Hong Kong, and then-Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) even envisioned building several Hong Kongs. It was quite unexpected that after 1997 it would be exploited and trampled on by China, especially after Xi took power.
Now that Hong Kongers are protesting, the whole world understands the Chinese evil. The Western world should take this opportunity to help Hong Kongers protect their core values and use their independent judiciary, freedom, human rights and economic strength to influence China. Hong Kong should be on the front line for the promotion of reform in China.
Such a policy would require the support of the US and all Asia-Pacific nations. Without that, Hong Kong’s only option would be to aim for independence.
The 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration is an international treaty submitted to the UN, which means that US legislation is not a matter of “interference in China’s domestic affairs.”
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs